On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:30:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > it is called so early. I can get past it by adding:
> >
> > CFLAGS_mem_encrypt.o := $(nostackp)
> >
> > in the arch/x86/mm/Makefile, but that obviously eliminates the support
> > for the whole file. Would it be better to split
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:50:19PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> There is still one thing which I don't understand. Why __schedule()
> (patched or the original) is not on the stack. The actual "sleep"
> should happen in __switch_to_asm() which is C function now. And there is a
> call to
>
> Of course __switch_to_asm() is not patchable for the reason described in
> the section. But there is no __fentry__ call and I cannot imagine a
> reason to do it anyway.
>
> Therefore, remove the paragraphs from the section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbe.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:16:17PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is a concern and I'm not sure what the best way to fix it
> > is. If both MODULE_NAME_LEN and KSYM_NAME_LEN were straight up
> > constants, then I think Josh's stringify approach
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:46:51AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:31:57PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
> > > index 780f00c..2aa20fa 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/livepatch/core.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:47:04PM -0400, Jessica Yu wrote:
> For livepatch modules, copy Elf section, symbol, and string information
> from the load_info struct in the module loader. Persist copies of the
> original symbol table and string table.
>
> Livepatch manages its own relocation sections
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:11:07PM -0500, Jessica Yu wrote:
> For livepatch modules, copy Elf section, symbol, and string information
> from the load_info struct in the module loader. Persist copies of the
> original symbol table and string table.
>
> Livepatch manages its own relocation sections
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:37:52PM -0500, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Jessica Yu [03/02/16 20:11 -0500]:
> >Livepatch needs to utilize the symbol information contained in the
> >mod_arch_specific struct in order to be able to call the s390
> >apply_relocate_add() function to apply relocations. Keep a
