Re: [RFC 1/4] drm: Add writeback connector type

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Sean Paul wrote: > > Have we considered hiding writeback behind a client cap instead? It is kinda *almost* unneeded, since the connector reports itself as disconnected. I'm not sure what the reason was to drop the cap, but I think it

Re: [RFC 1/4] drm: Add writeback connector type

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:17:51AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> From: Brian Starkey <brian.star...@arm.com> >> >> Writeback connectors represent writeback engines which c

[RFC 1/4] drm: Add writeback connector type

-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <mihail.atanas...@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com> [rebased and added atomic_commit() vfunc for writeback jobs] Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> --- Documentation/gpu/drm-kms.rst| 9 ++ drivers/gpu/d