From: Guillaume Dore <cor...@poussif.eu>

There was a typo in adding-syscalls.rst that could mislead developers
to add a C filename in a makefile instead of an object filename.
This error, while not keeping developers from contributing could slow
the development process down by introducing build errors.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Dore <cor...@poussif.eu>
---
 Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst 
b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
index 0d4f29bc798b..88a7d5c8bb2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ normally be optional, so add a ``CONFIG`` option (typically 
to
    by the option.
  - Make the option depend on EXPERT if it should be hidden from normal users.
  - Make any new source files implementing the function dependent on the CONFIG
-   option in the Makefile (e.g. ``obj-$(CONFIG_XYZZY_SYSCALL) += xyzzy.c``).
+   option in the Makefile (e.g. ``obj-$(CONFIG_XYZZY_SYSCALL) += xyzzy.o``).
  - Double check that the kernel still builds with the new CONFIG option turned
    off.
 
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to