Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.

2018-05-08 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri,  4 May 2018 23:11:49 +0200
Andrea Parri  wrote:

> The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri 

Applied, thanks.

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.

2018-05-04 Thread Andrea Parri
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:13:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrea Parri
>  wrote:
> > The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst 
> > b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against 
> > the change in
> >  these memory ordering guarantees.
> >
> >  The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined 
> > in
> > -github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> > +tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
> >
> >  memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
> >  memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.
> 
> Will this get linkified by rst ?

I believe not, but I'm not too familiar with rst...  FWIW, I'm seeing that
the above memory-barriers.txt, atomic_t.txt are not linkified.

  Andrea


> 
> -Kees
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.

2018-05-04 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrea Parri
 wrote:
> The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri 
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst 
> b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against 
> the change in
>  these memory ordering guarantees.
>
>  The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
> -github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> +tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
>
>  memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
>  memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.

Will this get linkified by rst ?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.

2018-05-04 Thread Andrea Parri
The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri 
---
 Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst 
b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against the 
change in
 these memory ordering guarantees.
 
 The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
-github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
+tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
 
 memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
 memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html