Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:13:03 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Argh! PDF output is really fragile. I would change it then to: > > .. [#f1] You can, optionally, provide both good and bad arguments at git >start: ``git bisect start [BAD] [GOOD]`` > > Do you

Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:39:02 -0700 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:03:17 -0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > +.. [#f1] You can, optionally, provide both good and bad arguments at git > > +start:: > > + > > + git

Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

Em Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:55:26 -0700 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:03:17 -0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Better organize the admin guide documentation by moving the > > bug bisect to a separate file. > > > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:03:17 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > +.. [#f1] You can, optionally, provide both good and bad arguments at git > + start:: > + > + git bisect start [BAD] [GOOD] So this, as it turns out, kills the PDF build: Markup is

Re: [PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:03:17 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Better organize the admin guide documentation by moving the > bug bisect to a separate file. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > --- >

[PATCH 2/4] doc-rst: admin-guide: move bug bisect to a separate file

Better organize the admin guide documentation by moving the bug bisect to a separate file. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- Documentation/admin-guide/bug-bisect.rst | 78 +++ Documentation/admin-guide/bug-hunting.rst | 74