Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 07:39:50PM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:56 +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > > > Today when we run checkers we get

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 17:56 +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to > > > > make any sense of it. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to > > > make any sense of it. > > > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:46 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to > > > make any sense of it. > > > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:05:15PM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/compare/master...knuto:runchecks Several of these to rdma/core do not look so big, you should think about sending them.. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc"

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:00:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > Today when we run checkers we get so many warnings it is too hard to > > make any sense of it. > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband > sorted by type. > > Many of these might be corrected by using >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 07:30 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 14:05 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband > > > sorted by type. > > > > > > Many of these might be corrected by using > > > > > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 14:05 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > Here is a list of the checkpatch messages for drivers/infiniband > > sorted by type. > > > > Many of these might be corrected by using > > > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types= \ > > $(git ls-files drivers/infiniband/)

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main > > > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against > > > the policy that

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > > > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main > > > > upstream tree. But adding

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sun, 2017-12-17 at 22:00 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main > > > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against > > > the policy that

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 03:14:10AM +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > I like the ability to add more checkers and keep then in the main > > upstream tree. But adding overrides for specific subsystems goes against > > the policy that all subsystems should be treated equally. > > This is a tool to

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100 > Knut Omang wrote: > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on > > the > > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100 > Knut Omang wrote: > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on > > the > > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:42:25 +0100 Knut Omang wrote: > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > > This is done by replacing the sparse specific setup for the C={1,2}

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 09:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:27 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:27 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers > > > on the > > > entire kernel as part of automatic

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on > > the > > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > > This seems like a useful and

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. This seems like a useful and reasonable series, thanks. Do please take Julia's grammar updates. How is

[PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program

This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. This is done by replacing the sparse specific setup for the C={1,2} variable in the makefiles with setup for running scripts/runchecks, a new program that can