On 08/28/2017 01:58 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 02:34 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v2->v3:
>> - Add a faster pruning rate when the free pool is closed to depletion.
>> - As suggested by James Bottomley, add an artificial delay waiting
>> loop before killing a negative dentry and
On 07/28/2017 02:34 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> v2->v3:
> - Add a faster pruning rate when the free pool is closed to depletion.
> - As suggested by James Bottomley, add an artificial delay waiting
> loop before killing a negative dentry and properly clear the
> DCACHE_KILL_NEGATIVE flag
. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries
>
> On 08/20/2017 11:23 PM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I have add some trace info for the d
On 08/20/2017 11:23 PM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
>
> Yes, I have add some trace info for the dentry state changed, with dentry
> flag and reference count:
>
> File create:
> [ 42.636675] dentry [_1234] 0x880230be8180 flag 0x0 ref 1 ev dentry
> alloc
> File close:
> [ 42.637421]
. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries
>
> On 08/18/2017 05:59 AM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
> >
> >>> In my patch the DCACHE_FILE_R
On 08/18/2017 05:59 AM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
>
>>> In my patch the DCACHE_FILE_REMOVED flag was to distinguish the
>>> removed file and The closed file, I found there was no difference of a
>>> dentry between the removed file and the closed File, they all on the lru
>>> list.
>> There is a
. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries
>
> On 08/17/2017 12:00 AM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Hi Longman,
&
On 08/17/2017 12:00 AM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Hi Longman,
>>> I am a fresher of fsdevel, about 2 weeks before, I have joined this
>>> mail list, recently I have met the same problem of negative dentries,
>>> in my opinion, the dentries should be remove together with the files or
>>
; Paul E. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries
>
> On 08/16/2017 06:33 AM, Wangkai (Kevin,C) wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> &g
nathan Corbet
>> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; Paul E. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
>> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of
ernel.org;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; Paul E. McKenney; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar;
> Miklos Szeredi; Matthew Wilcox; Larry Woodman; James Bottomley
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fs/dcache: Limit # of negative dentries
>
> On 07/28/2017 02:34 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> > v2
On 07/28/2017 02:34 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> v2->v3:
> - Add a faster pruning rate when the free pool is closed to depletion.
> - As suggested by James Bottomley, add an artificial delay waiting
> loop before killing a negative dentry and properly clear the
> DCACHE_KILL_NEGATIVE flag
v2->v3:
- Add a faster pruning rate when the free pool is closed to depletion.
- As suggested by James Bottomley, add an artificial delay waiting
loop before killing a negative dentry and properly clear the
DCACHE_KILL_NEGATIVE flag if killing doesn't happen.
- Add a new patch to
13 matches
Mail list logo
