On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:38:32 +0100
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > - info.archdata = _ad;
> >
> > Why did you drop this?
>
> If the removal is safe, it should be a seperate patch, I mean.
>
Sure, I'll move that in a separate patch. Actually, I had a closer look
and it seems
Hi Wolfram,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:35:18 +0100
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > - rebase on v4.15-rc1
>
> This code has changed a little meanwhile. Please check my for-next
> branch. Some changes are identical, some similar.
Actually it was rebased on top of
> > - info.archdata = _ad;
>
> Why did you drop this?
If the removal is safe, it should be a seperate patch, I mean.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Boris,
> - rebase on v4.15-rc1
This code has changed a little meanwhile. Please check my for-next
branch. Some changes are identical, some similar.
> - info.archdata = _ad;
Why did you drop this?
Regards,
Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
From: Boris Brezillon
I3C busses have to know about all I2C devices connected on the I3C bus
to properly initialize the I3C master, and I2C frames can't be sent on
the bus until this initialization is done.
We can't let the I2C core parse the DT and