Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-08 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:23:23 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100 > Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what > > Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating > >

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 02/07/2017 10:19 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote: Hi Jesper, On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:51:49 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > I sounds like Daniel (see other email) have bigger plans for what > Documentation/BPF/ should contain. E.g. consolidating > Documentation/networking/filter.txt which covers the cBPF/eBPF internals. > If that is

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:43:38 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? > > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? > >

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:46:08 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100 > Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? > > > > > > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:09:08 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? > > > > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ > > What about this question?

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Daniel Borkmann
Hi Jesper, On 02/07/2017 03:30 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep it

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:37:17 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100 > Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? > > > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? > >

Re: [net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? > > If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ > If it will not appear sooner that way, then

[net-next PATCH 0/4] Documenting eBPF - extended Berkeley Packet Filter

2017-02-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Question: What kernel tree should this go into??? If going through Jonathan Corbet, will it appear sooner here??? https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ If it will not appear sooner that way, then it's likely best to keep it in sync with the tree that takes eBPF code changes. This marks the