Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-12-06 Thread Yury Norov
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:24:11PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > > > On 2016/12/5 18:07, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" wrote: > > > >>Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. > > > >All the

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-12-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 11:07 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" > wrote: > > > > > Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those > > issues. > All the elf/nptl/rt fails should be fixed by the recent binutils >

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-12-05 Thread Zhangjian (Bamvor)
On 2016/12/5 18:07, Andreas Schwab wrote: On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" wrote: Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. All the elf/nptl/rt fails should be fixed by the recent binutils fixes. Cool. How about the conform

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-12-05 Thread Zhangjian (Bamvor)
Hi, Steve On 2016/11/18 5:45, Steve Ellcey wrote: On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 15:22 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Yury Norov wrote: Below is the results of glibc testsuite run for aarch64/lp64 I have been running the glibc testsuite as

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-12-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Dez 05 2016, "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" wrote: > Is there some progresses on it? We could collabrate to fix those issues. All the elf/nptl/rt fails should be fixed by the recent binutils fixes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-11-17 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 15:22 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > > > On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Yury Norov > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Below is the results of glibc testsuite run for aarch64/lp64 I have been running the glibc testsuite as well.  I have only run it on an

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-11-17 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:22:26PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Regarding ILP32 runtime, my opinion is that it is acceptable for ILP32 > to have extra failures compared to LP64, since these are not > regressions, but, rather, failures of a new configuration. I disagree with this. We definitely

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-11-16 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Yury Norov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:53:59PM +0530, Yury Norov wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> [add libc-alpha mail list] >> >> For libc-alpha: this is the part of LKML submission with latest >> patches for aarch64/ilp32. >>

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-11-09 Thread Yury Norov
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:53:59PM +0530, Yury Norov wrote: > Hi all, > > [add libc-alpha mail list] > > For libc-alpha: this is the part of LKML submission with latest > patches for aarch64/ilp32. > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg537846.html > > Glibc that I use has also included

Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

2016-11-07 Thread Yury Norov
Hi all, [add libc-alpha mail list] For libc-alpha: this is the part of LKML submission with latest patches for aarch64/ilp32. https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg537846.html Glibc that I use has also included consolidation patches from Adhemerval Zanella and me that are still not in the