Re: Italian translations and broken links
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:51:18 +0200 Federico Vaga wrote: > Since there are many documents, this take time and perhaps we can already > push > the ones which are ready. > > My big dilemma is (which is more general): what about broken references? Do > we > keep broken links which we know they will be correct in the future? Or, do we > remove all broken links and we add them back only when they work (if we > remember)? We want the kernel to be as close to release-ready as it can be at any time, that includes the docs. So please no broken links. It's a bit more work to keep things coherent, but it's what we need to do in the long run. Thanks, jon
Italian translations and broken links
Hi Jon, just one question about how do you prefer us to proceed. We are translating the process directory. My idea was to complete it and then push it. This because the documents in here have links to other documents in the same directory. In order to cleanly build it I wanted to translate the full directory and then propose a patch. Since there are many documents, this take time and perhaps we can already push the ones which are ready. My big dilemma is (which is more general): what about broken references? Do we keep broken links which we know they will be correct in the future? Or, do we remove all broken links and we add them back only when they work (if we remember)? Thanks :)
Re: Italian translations and broken links
Answer to this email address, I did a mistake :) On Friday, August 24, 2018 1:51:18 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote: > Hi Jon, > > just one question about how do you prefer us to proceed. We are translating > the process directory. > My idea was to complete it and then push it. This because the documents in > here have links to other documents in the same directory. In order to > cleanly build it I wanted to translate the full directory and then propose > a patch. > > Since there are many documents, this take time and perhaps we can already > push the ones which are ready. > > My big dilemma is (which is more general): what about broken references? Do > we keep broken links which we know they will be correct in the future? Or, > do we remove all broken links and we add them back only when they work (if > we remember)? > > Thanks :)
