Re: [PATCH] docs/core-api: make mm-api.rst more structured

2018-12-06 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:45:44 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote: > The mm-api.rst covers variety of memory management APIs under "More Memory > Management Functions" section. The descriptions included there are in a > random order there are quite a few of them which makes the section too > long. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-06 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 06.12.18 01:26, Wei Yang wrote: > Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. > > Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: > > * device_hotplug_lock > * mem_hotplug_lock > > to serialise the process. > > While for the long term, we are willing to have more

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:26:22AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. > > Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: > > * device_hotplug_lock > * mem_hotplug_lock > > to serialise the process. > > While for the long term, we

[PATCH v2 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more suitable for this. This patch removes the duplication part here. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Mike Rapoport --- Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst | 40

[PATCH v2 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: * device_hotplug_lock * mem_hotplug_lock to serialise the process. While for the long term, we are willing to have more fine-grained lock to provide higher scalability. This

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:13:10PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: >On Wed 05-12-18 10:34:26, Wei Yang wrote: >> Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. >> >> Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: >> >> * device_hotplug_lock >> * mem_hotplug_lock >> >> to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 05-12-18 10:34:26, Wei Yang wrote: > Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. > > Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: > > * device_hotplug_lock > * mem_hotplug_lock > > to serialise the process. > > While for the long term, we are willing to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 05-12-18 10:34:25, Wei Yang wrote: > Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more > suitable for this. > > This patch removes the duplication part here. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang Yes this doesn't really make any sense in an admin guide. It is a pure

[PATCH v1 8/9] drm/doc: Add initial komeda driver documentation

2018-12-05 Thread james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
Signed-off-by: James (Qian) Wang --- Documentation/gpu/drivers.rst| 1 + Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst | 483 +++ 2 files changed, 484 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drivers.rst

[PATCH v1 8/9] drm/doc: Add initial komeda driver documentation

2018-12-05 Thread james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
Signed-off-by: James (Qian) Wang --- Documentation/gpu/drivers.rst| 1 + Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst | 483 +++ 2 files changed, 484 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/komeda-kms.rst diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drivers.rst

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:40:45AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:34:26AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. >> >> Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: >> >> * device_hotplug_lock >> *

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:08:47AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: >> Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. >> >> Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: >> >> * device_hotplug_lock >> * mem_hotplug_lock >> >> to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:30:13AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:03:24AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: >> > Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more >> > suitable for this. >> > >> > This patch

Re: [PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:03:24AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: >> Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more >> suitable for this. >> >> This patch removes the duplication part here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> --- >>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:34:26AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. > > Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: > > * device_hotplug_lock > * mem_hotplug_lock > > to serialise the process. > > While for the long term, we

Re: [PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:03:24AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: > > Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more > > suitable for this. > > > > This patch removes the duplication part here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-05 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: > Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. > > Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: > > * device_hotplug_lock > * mem_hotplug_lock > > to serialise the process. > > While for the long term, we are willing to have more

Re: [PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-05 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 05.12.18 03:34, Wei Yang wrote: > Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more > suitable for this. > > This patch removes the duplication part here. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst | 40 >

[PATCH 2/2] core-api/memory-hotplug.rst: divide Locking Internal section by different locks

2018-12-04 Thread Wei Yang
Currently locking for memory hotplug is a little complicated. Generally speaking, we leverage the two global lock: * device_hotplug_lock * mem_hotplug_lock to serialise the process. While for the long term, we are willing to have more fine-grained lock to provide higher scalability. This

[PATCH 1/2] admin-guide/memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking internal part from admin-guide

2018-12-04 Thread Wei Yang
Locking Internal section exists in core-api documentation, which is more suitable for this. This patch removes the duplication part here. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang --- Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst | 40 - 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-) diff --git

RE,

2018-12-03 Thread Ms Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa
-- Hello, First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a very important proposal for you.

Brauchen Sie einen Kredit?

2018-12-03 Thread Becky Wilson
-- Brauchen Sie einen Kredit?

[RFC] Documentation: use RFC 5735 subnet for examples

2018-11-30 Thread Matteo Croce
RFC 5735 defines this subnets for documentation and example code: 192.0.2.0/24 as TEST-NET-1 198.51.100.0/24 as TEST-NET-2 203.0.113.0/24 as TEST-NET-3 Replace where possible the IP addresses in the documentation with addresses belonging to the test subnets. Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce

[PATCH] docs/core-api: make mm-api.rst more structured

2018-11-28 Thread Mike Rapoport
The mm-api.rst covers variety of memory management APIs under "More Memory Management Functions" section. The descriptions included there are in a random order there are quite a few of them which makes the section too long. Regrouping the documentation by subject and splitting the long "More

[no subject]

2018-11-26 Thread Offer
-- Guten Tag, Wir sind eine registrierte private Geldverleiher. Wir geben Kredite an Firmen, Einzelpersonen, die ihre finanzielle Status auf der ganzen Welt aktualisieren müssen, mit minimalen jährlichen Zinsen von 2% .reply, wenn nötig. Good Day, We are a registered private money lender. We

Re: Did You Receive My Last Mail?

2018-11-26 Thread Reem Al-Hashimi
Hello, My name is ms. Reem Al-Hashimi. The UAE minister of state for international cooparation. I got your contact from an email database from your country. I have a financial transaction i would like to discuss with you. Please reply to reem2...@daum.net, for more details if you are

Re: [PATCH 1/1] scripts/kernel-doc: Fix struct and struct field attribute processing

2018-11-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:06:04 +0200 Sakari Ailus wrote: > The kernel-doc attempts to clear the struct and struct member attributes > from the API documentation it produces. It falls short of the job in the > following respects: > > - extra whitespaces are left where __attribute__((...)) was

RE,

2018-11-24 Thread Miss Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa
Hello, First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a very important proposal for you.

RE,

2018-11-24 Thread Miss Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa
Hello, First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a very important proposal for you.

RE,

2018-11-24 Thread Miss Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa
Hello, First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a very important proposal for you.

RE,

2018-11-24 Thread Miss Sharifah Ahmad Mustahfa
Hello, First of all i will like to apologies for my manner of communication because you do not know me personally, its due to the fact that i have a very important proposal for you.

[PATCH 1/1] scripts/kernel-doc: Fix struct and struct field attribute processing

2018-11-22 Thread Sakari Ailus
The kernel-doc attempts to clear the struct and struct member attributes from the API documentation it produces. It falls short of the job in the following respects: - extra whitespaces are left where __attribute__((...)) was removed, - only a single attribute is removed per struct, -

Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

2018-11-20 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 11/14/2018 1:04 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 10/24/2018 1:12 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Casey Schaufler >> wrote: >>> On 10/23/2018 12:05 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: On 10/23/2018 11:50 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > Did you poke around at my combined

Re: [PATCH v2] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar and style fixups

2018-11-20 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:24:23 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > > v2: address Matthew's feedback > > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst | 51 > --- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25

Re: [PATCH] docs/mm: update kmalloc kernel-doc description

2018-11-20 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 18:48:44 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote: > Add references to GFP documentation and the memory-allocation.rst and remove > GFP_USER, GFP_DMA and GFP_NOIO descriptions. > > While on it slightly change the formatting so that the list of GFP flags > will be rendered as "description"

Re: [PATCH] Link the memory allocation guide from the MM docs

2018-11-20 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:00:49 -0800 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I just went looking for the memory allocation guide in the MM docs instead > of in the core API. For the benefit of the next person who makes that > mistake, link to it from the MM docs. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Applied,

Re: [PATCH] Link the memory allocation guide from the MM docs

2018-11-19 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:00:49AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I just went looking for the memory allocation guide in the MM docs instead > of in the core API. For the benefit of the next person who makes that > mistake, link to it from the MM docs. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox

Re: [PATCH v2] Document /proc/pid PID reuse behavior

2018-11-19 Thread Daniel Colascione
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2018-11-05 13:22:05, Daniel Colascione wrote: >> State explicitly that holding a /proc/pid file descriptor open does >> not reserve the PID. Also note that in the event of PID reuse, these >> open file descriptors refer to the old,

Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] mm: convert PG_balloon to PG_offline

2018-11-19 Thread David Hildenbrand
> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h > index 50ce1bddaf56..f91da3d0a67e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h > @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ PAGEFLAG_FALSE(DoubleMap) > #define PAGE_TYPE_BASE 0xf000 > /* Reserve

[PATCH] Link the memory allocation guide from the MM docs

2018-11-19 Thread Matthew Wilcox
I just went looking for the memory allocation guide in the MM docs instead of in the core API. For the benefit of the next person who makes that mistake, link to it from the MM docs. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst

Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

2018-11-14 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 10/24/2018 1:12 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Casey Schaufler > wrote: >> On 10/23/2018 12:05 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: >>> On 10/23/2018 11:50 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> Did you poke around at my combined series?

Inquiry 12/11/2018

2018-11-12 Thread sinara-group
Hi,friend, This is Daniel Murray and i am from Sinara Group Co.Ltd Group Co.,LTD in Russia. We are glad to know about your company from the web and we are interested in your products. Could you kindly send us your Latest catalog and price list for our trial order. Best Regards, Daniel

Price Inquiry

2018-11-11 Thread Daniel Murray
Hi,friend, This is Daniel Murray and i am from Sinara Group Co.Ltd Group Co.,LTD in Russia. We are glad to know about your company from the web and we are interested in your products. Could you kindly send us your Latest catalog and price list for our trial order. Best Regards, Daniel

[PATCH] docs/mm: update kmalloc kernel-doc description

2018-11-11 Thread Mike Rapoport
Add references to GFP documentation and the memory-allocation.rst and remove GFP_USER, GFP_DMA and GFP_NOIO descriptions. While on it slightly change the formatting so that the list of GFP flags will be rendered as "description" in the generated html. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport --- Probably

[PATCH v2] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar and style fixups

2018-11-11 Thread Mike Rapoport
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap --- v2: address Matthew's feedback Documentation/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst | 51 --- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst

Re: [PATCH v2] doc: tracing: Fix a number of typos

2018-11-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:57:17 -0400 Amir Livneh wrote: > Trivial fixes to spelling mistakes in ftrace.rst > > v2: tripple -> triple > > Signed-off-by: Amir Livneh Applied, thanks. jon

[PATCH] mm/gup: fix follow_page_mask kernel-doc comment

2018-11-07 Thread Mike Rapoport
Commit df06b37ffe5a ("mm/gup: cache dev_pagemap while pinning pages") modified the signature of follow_page_mask() function but left the parameter description behind. Update the description to make the code and comments agree again. While on it, update formatting of the return value description

Re: [PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-06 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:29:27PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/5/18 10:35 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:12:40PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > >>> @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ Virtual Memory Primer > >>>

Re: [PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/5/18 10:35 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:12:40PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ Virtual Memory Primer >>> The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and >>>

Re: [PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:12:40PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ Virtual Memory Primer > > The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and > > even for systems that support memory hotplug

Re: [PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ Virtual Memory Primer > The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and > even for systems that support memory hotplug there is a hard limit on > the amount of memory that can be installed.

Re: [PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/5/18 11:58 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > Cc: Randy Dunlap > --- > > There was a couple of grammar fixes Randy suggested a while ago, but it > seems I've never sent them out. > > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst | 39 >

[PATCH] docs/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst: grammar fixups

2018-11-05 Thread Mike Rapoport
From: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Cc: Randy Dunlap --- There was a couple of grammar fixes Randy suggested a while ago, but it seems I've never sent them out. Documentation/admin-guide/mm/concepts.rst | 39 --- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:15 AM Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > This patch would work for me: Thanks, applied, Linus

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:15:35 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > Follow-up question: the __no_sanitize_address_or_inline define has the > 'notrace' > option that is missing for __no_kasan_or_inline. We need that option for > __load_psw_mask, if we do the replacement all users of

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-05 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:02:56 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:09:32 -0700 > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:43 AM Andrey Ryabinin > > wrote: > > > > > > You're right, version checks shouldn't matter here. But > > > __no_sanitize_address_or_inline

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-04 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:09:32 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:43 AM Andrey Ryabinin > wrote: > > > > You're right, version checks shouldn't matter here. But > > __no_sanitize_address_or_inline > > shouldn't have been added in the first place, because we already have > >

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
On 11/02/2018 07:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:16 AM Andrey Ryabinin > wrote: >> >> On 11/02/2018 04:46 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> >>> So I _think_ the KASAN config should have a >>> >>> depends on CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 40902 >>> >>> on it, but maybe

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:16 AM Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > On 11/02/2018 04:46 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So I _think_ the KASAN config should have a > > > > depends on CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 40902 > > > > on it, but maybe there is something I'm missing. > > I'd rather use

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:43 AM Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > You're right, version checks shouldn't matter here. But > __no_sanitize_address_or_inline > shouldn't have been added in the first place, because we already have almost > the same >__no_kasan_or_inline: Ahh, very good. Vasily, Martin -

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
On 11/02/2018 04:46 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> The logic for using __no_sanitize_address *used* to be >> >> #if GCC_VERSION >= 40902 > > Ok, looking around, I think this has less to do with the attribute > being recognized,

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:52 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, I decided to do the merge by just getting rid of the > GCC_VERSION check around __no_sanitize_address_or_inline entirely. If > you enable KASAN, then a function with that marking just won't be > marked inline. I was a bit confused

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-02 Thread Andrey Ryabinin
On 11/01/2018 08:06 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miguel Ojeda > wrote: >> >> Here it is the Compiler Attributes series/tree, which tries to disentangle >> the include/linux/compiler*.h headers and bring them up to date. > > I've finally emptied the "normal" pull

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:06 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The logic for using __no_sanitize_address *used* to be > > #if GCC_VERSION >= 40902 Ok, looking around, I think this has less to do with the attribute being recognized, and simply just being because KASAN itself wants gcc-4.9.2. I'm

Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-11-01 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:06 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I'm not sure how much that matters (maybe the original check for 4.9.2 > was just a random pick by Andrey? Added to cc), but together with the > movement to that looks like it also > wouldn't want the CONFIG_KASAN tests, I wonder what the

Re: [PATCH] doc: tracing: Fix a number of typos

2018-11-01 Thread Will Korteland
On 2018-10-31 14:16, Amir Livneh wrote: > @@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ The following commands are supported: >When the function is hit, it will dump the contents of the ftrace >ring buffer to the console. This is useful if you need to debug >something, and want to dump the trace when a

[PATCH] doc: tracing: Fix a number of typos

2018-10-31 Thread Amir Livneh
Trivial fixes to spelling mistakes in ftrace.rst Signed-off-by: Amir Livneh --- Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst index 7ea16a0ceffc..80fde12e6564

Re: [PATCH v10 4/9] dt-bindings: i3c: Document core bindings

2018-10-30 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:43:28 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > A new I3C subsystem has been added and a generic description has been > created to represent the I3C bus and the devices connected on it. > > Document this generic representation. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon

Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

2018-10-24 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 10/23/2018 12:05 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> On 10/23/2018 11:50 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >>> Did you poke around at my combined series? >>>

Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

2018-10-24 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 10/23/2018 12:05 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 10/23/2018 11:50 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Did you poke around at my combined series? >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=lsm/ordering-v6-blob-sharing > I hope to do that on the plane later today. I had a

Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering

2018-10-23 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 10/23/2018 11:50 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Casey Schaufler > wrote: >> On 10/12/2018 12:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Friday, October 12, 2018 3:19 AM, John Johansen >>> wrote: It isn't perfect but it manages consistency across distros as best as can

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: add support for __fallthrough (gcc >= 7.1)

2018-10-22 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:15 AM Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > Hi all! > > On 22/10/18 19:54, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:50 AM Bernd Petrovitsch > > wrote: > [...] > >> PS: clang++ errors with "fallthrough annotation in unreachable code" if > >> [[fallthrough]] is

[GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1

2018-10-22 Thread Miguel Ojeda
Hi Linus, Here it is the Compiler Attributes series/tree, which tries to disentangle the include/linux/compiler*.h headers and bring them up to date. The patches have been in linux-next for a while, *except* the last two from Nick which came a bit later. Since AFAIU there will be no linux-next

[PATCH] doc: fix a typo in adding-syscalls.rst

2018-10-18 Thread corwin
From: Guillaume Dore There was a typo in adding-syscalls.rst that could mislead developers to add a C filename in a makefile instead of an object filename. This error, while not keeping developers from contributing could slow the development process down by introducing build errors.

Re: [PATCH] doc: fix a typo in adding-syscalls.rst

2018-10-18 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:47:50 +0200 cor...@poussif.eu wrote: > There was a typo in adding-syscalls.rst that could mislead developers > to add a C filename in a makefile instead of an object filename. > This error, while not keeping developers from contributing could slow > the development process

[no subject]

2018-10-17 Thread noureddine TAOUAF
Hallo Am Mrs Mavis Wancyzk, Sie haben eine Spende von 2,800,000.00EUR Ich gewann die America Lottery im Wert von $ 758.7 Millionen und ich spende einen Teil davon an fnf glckliche Menschen und Wohlttigkeits-Huser in Erinnerung an meinen verstorbenen Ehemann, der an Krebs gestorben ist.

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-15 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:55:49 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > OK, I've had a long conversation with the LF lawyer, and she said clearly > > that we really should not be introducing CC-SA material into the kernel > > source tree. It's a pain; I really do like CC-SA better for > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:27:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 > Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible > > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this > > point - if it's OK I'll

URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED

2018-10-12 Thread Sean Kim.
Hello my dear. Did you receive my email message to you? Please, get back to me ASAP as the matter is becoming late. Expecting your urgent response. Sean.

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-11 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:27:35AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 Dave Chinner > wrote: > > > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is > > acceptible or not? That's really the only thing that we need > > clarified at this point - if it's OK I'll

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-11 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this > point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20 > merge window. If not, we'll go

Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/vm: split memory hotplug notifier description to Documentation/core-api

2018-10-07 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:46:40AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 01:11:01 +0300 > Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > The memory hotplug notifier description is about kernel internals rather > > than admin/user visible API. Place it appropriately. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike

Re: [PATCH] docs: improve readability for people with poorer eyesight

2018-10-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:06:03 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > o my eyesight still hasn't fully recovered, so in the meantime it's > been difficult to read the online documentation. Here's some stylesheet > overrides I've been using to make it easier for me to read them: >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/vm: split memory hotplug notifier description to Documentation/core-api

2018-10-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 01:11:01 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > The memory hotplug notifier description is about kernel internals rather > than admin/user visible API. Place it appropriately. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport One little nit... > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst|

Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: promote the ext4 data structures book to top level

2018-10-07 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 19:49:52 -0400 "Theodore Y. Ts'o" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Move the ext4 data structures book to Documentation/filesystems/ext4/ > > since the administrative information moved elsewhere. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-06 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 06:29:51 -0700 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I had an informal chat with Bradley Kuhn at LinuxCon Japan about using > CC-BY-SA-4.0 and he indicated that I was probably better off using the > GPL-2(+) for documentation. I've changed the XArray documentation from > CC-BY-SA-4.0 to

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-06 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 10:51:54AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:18:11PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst > > format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] Compiler Attributes

2018-10-06 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 9:13 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Miguel, > > In my testoings I am booting in QEMU and on bare metal. > Both tests were successful. Wow! I only wanted to confirm it booted and/or run for a while -- but having more information is always good. Thanks a *lot*! I will add a

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:01:20PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 > Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible > > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this > > point - if it's OK I'll

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-05 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this > point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20 > merge window. If not, we'll go

Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs-4.20: major documentation surgery

2018-10-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:18:11PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst > format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and > then begins pulling in the contents of the Data Structures & Algorithms >

Re: [PATCH] docs: improve readability for people with poorer eyesight

2018-10-05 Thread Dave Chinner
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:06:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi, > > So my eyesight still hasn't fully recovered, so in the meantime it's > been difficult to read the online documentation. Here's some stylesheet > overrides I've been using to make it easier for me to read them: >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: promote the ext4 data structures book to top level

2018-10-05 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > Move the ext4 data structures book to Documentation/filesystems/ext4/ > since the administrative information moved elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Thanks, applied and pushed out to the

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext4: even more documentation fixes

2018-10-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/5/18 8:22 AM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 07:48:31PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Hi Darrick, >> >> I don't see patch 2/2 anywhere (my inbox, email archives)... > > Probably because it's moving a lot of files around, so the diffs were 276k. Oh, yeah. Thanks. --

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext4: even more documentation fixes

2018-10-05 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 07:48:31PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi Darrick, > > I don't see patch 2/2 anywhere (my inbox, email archives)... Probably because it's moving a lot of files around, so the diffs were 276k. > > -- > ~Randy

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext4: even more documentation fixes

2018-10-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/4/18 5:59 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > This series fixes some problems that were brought up during review for > the XFS documentation which I hadn't known about when pushing the ext4 > documentation during the 4.19 cycle. > > The first patch moves the ext4 mount option and

[PATCH] docs: improve readability for people with poorer eyesight

2018-10-04 Thread Darrick J. Wong
Hi, So my eyesight still hasn't fully recovered, so in the meantime it's been difficult to read the online documentation. Here's some stylesheet overrides I've been using to make it easier for me to read them: https://djwong.org/docs/kdoc/index.html --- From: Darrick J. Wong My eyesight is

[PATCH 1/2] docs: move ext4 administrative docs to admin-guide/

2018-10-04 Thread Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong Move the ext4 mount option and other administrative stuff to the Linux administrator's guide. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst | 574 ++ Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst |1

[PATCH 0/2] ext4: even more documentation fixes

2018-10-04 Thread Darrick J. Wong
Hi all, This series fixes some problems that were brought up during review for the XFS documentation which I hadn't known about when pushing the ext4 documentation during the 4.19 cycle. The first patch moves the ext4 mount option and sysfs knob information into the Linux administration guide.

[PATCH 2/2] docs/vm: split memory hotplug notifier description to Documentation/core-api

2018-10-04 Thread Mike Rapoport
The memory hotplug notifier description is about kernel internals rather than admin/user visible API. Place it appropriately. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport --- Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst| 83 - Documentation/core-api/index.rst | 2 +

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >