To answer your question, I booted ubuntu 7.04 and it trashed my card.
I powered off my computer for a while (removed power cord). Booted directly
to FC4. It detected the card in a cold state and loaded firmware correctly.
Remote control and card (both tuners) worked fine. Reboot into
Hi,
I'm taking some things on trust here, so feel free to tell me I am wrong.
My main source is http://www.dba.org.au/index.asp?sectionID=120
It says, among other things;
these parameters may be changed from time to time without warning,
receivers need to comply with
Manu Abraham wrote:
On 6/2/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007, Oliver Endriss wrote:
e9hack wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
e9hack wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
What the stv0297 wants is:
S Addr Wr [A] Comm [A] P S
So there is:
- zap ... intended for developers
- azap ... for ATSC and N.A dig. cable (STCE 07)
- czap ... for DVB-C
- szap ... for DVB-S
- szap2 ... for DVB-S2
- tzap ... for DVB-T
Is there any technical reason why these 6 utilities aren't blended
together into a __single__ comprehensive tuning
There a currently (very spartan) entries in the wiki for a
- Leadtek Winfast DTV1000
http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Leadtek_Winfast_DTV1000
and
- Leadtek Winfast DTV1000 T
http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Leadtek_Winfast_DTV_1000_T
I suspect these are one and the same. Can anyone
Again, looks like two entries in the wiki for the same entity:
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-NOVA-T_PCI
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Nova-T
Can someone confirm whether these are the same or different products.
Also, what is the Nova-T 500's relation to them
On Sunday 03 June 2007 19:51:35 CityK wrote:
Again, looks like two entries in the wiki for the same entity:
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-NOVA-T_PCI
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Nova-T
Can someone confirm whether these are the same or different products.
CityK wrote:
So there is:
- zap ... intended for developers
- azap ... for ATSC and N.A dig. cable (STCE 07)
- czap ... for DVB-C
- szap ... for DVB-S
- szap2 ... for DVB-S2
- tzap ... for DVB-T
Is there any technical reason why these 6 utilities aren't blended
together into a
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, CityK wrote:
So there is:
- zap ... intended for developers
- azap ... for ATSC and N.A dig. cable (STCE 07)
- czap ... for DVB-C
- szap ... for DVB-S
- szap2 ... for DVB-S2
- tzap ... for DVB-T
Is there any technical reason why these 6 utilities aren't blended
Nico Sabbi wrote:
CityK wrote:
So there is:
- zap ... intended for developers
- azap ... for ATSC and N.A dig. cable (STCE 07)
- czap ... for DVB-C
- szap ... for DVB-S
- szap2 ... for DVB-S2
- tzap ... for DVB-T
Is there any technical reason why these 6 utilities aren't blended
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007, CityK wrote:
So there is:
- zap ... intended for developers
- azap ... for ATSC and N.A dig. cable (STCE 07)
- czap ... for DVB-C
- szap ... for DVB-S
- szap2 ... for DVB-S2
- tzap ... for DVB-T
Is there any technical reason why these
Janne Grunau wrote:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 19:51:35 CityK wrote:
Again, looks like two entries in the wiki for the same entity:
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-NOVA-T_PCI
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Nova-T
Can someone confirm whether these are the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
