On Thursday 28 June 2007 22:35, Sascha Sommer wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:05, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Hi,
since I officially take care about the latest Empia em28xx code I
want to get that project removed from linuxtv.org.
Mauro already broke some parts in the incomplete
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Well it's solved now, whatever driver will come up in future from my
side I will not submit it to the linuxtv project due the experience I
made during the last 1 1/2 years.
You did a good job with em28xx, but when you tried to force people to
--- Peter Fern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig Cook wrote:
Try the instructions for the original dvico dual tuner...
Yeppo, the dev/input stuff is what you want, probably also worth writing
some udev rules, or using the by-id links in /dev/input to ensure you
don't get ordering problems
Petey Leinonen wrote:
--- Peter Fern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig Cook wrote:
Try the instructions for the original dvico dual tuner...
Yeppo, the dev/input stuff is what you want, probably also worth writing
some udev rules, or using the by-id links in /dev/input to ensure you
don't
Here is the polling patch from Henry Does this improve the
responsiveness of the remote.
Personally, I never had a problem with the default values that I had..
Dwaine,
I have applied this patch from Henry Wong, along with your original patch,
to the 2.6.17 kernel and I can confirm that
Michael Krufky wrote:
Petey Leinonen wrote:
--- Peter Fern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig Cook wrote:
Try the instructions for the original dvico dual tuner...
Yeppo, the dev/input stuff is what you want, probably also worth writing
some udev rules, or using the by-id links in /dev/input
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I've been following this whole process for quite some time now and also
tried to help out. I've come to the conclusion that it is purely due to
bad chemistry between various personalities. Technically this stuff
should have been merged a year ago
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, it is a good idea to have the manufacturer supporting their
drivers. However, it won't make any sense to allow Empiatech to touch on
low-level drivers for hardware not
On 6/29/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 6/28/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, it is a good idea to have the manufacturer supporting their
drivers. However, it won't make any sense to allow
On 6/29/07, Johannes Stezenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007, Hans Verkuil wrote:
I've been following this whole process for quite some time now and also
tried to help out. I've come to the conclusion that it is purely due to
bad chemistry between various personalities.
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't. Users (what
little of them Linux still has)
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't. Users (what
little of
Oliver Endriss wrote:
timecop wrote:
Hey guys, stop beating dead horses and finding scapegoats.
Whatever excuses you're going to find post-fact isn't going to change
the fact that HE now has working code with functionality better than
the broken crap currently in linux-dvb, and YOU don't.
Sebastian wrote:
Hello,
i recently bought a Technotrend S-1401 DVB-S card. Somehow this card
wont work for me, because i dont get a frontend0 device. Other device
nodes like demux0 or dvr0 are there, but frontend0 is missing. I am
using Linux 2.6.20-16 (2.6.21 tested too) and the latest
Hi Oliver,
Just in case you're not already aware, timecop/dongs/gnaa is a
professional troll. Unfortunately, he's latched onto the project --
he's building some ISDN usb devices and stealing code for them. Also
That would be ISDB-T, not ISDN sir.
And I don't want to be accused of stealing
CityK wrote:
In any regard, its best to just ignore him. He's just trying to get a
rise out of folks here.
Probably you are right. And I will not participate in any flame wars.
If someone is really interested to know what happened, he will hopefully
read all relevant messages and draw his own
16 matches
Mail list logo
