On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Since this didn't get commented here, Trent did that patch already 2
months ago but it's not included yet. So I recommend to include his
patch.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/543689
Acked-by:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/9/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/9/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger
There's also some responsibility by the users:
Users should THINK before they buy unsupported devices. If possible
buy devices that are supported by mainline.
This is the only way we can convince manufactures to contribute to the
Linux community.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:09:19AM -0300, Daniel
On 8/17/07, Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also some responsibility by the users:
Users should THINK before they buy unsupported devices. If possible
buy devices that are supported by mainline.
This is the only way we can convince manufactures to contribute to the
Linux community.
The reason is that the linuxtv project depends on people who have
their own ideas and do not care about other solutions or temporary
solutions to get things done, pulling the drivers to userspace adds
more flexibility for upcoming devices. Also it's possible to provide
one tuner binary for
Oliver Endriss schrieb:
Jukka Pirinen wrote:
As workaround I commented out initialisation of CI interface, that's not
a problem because I don't have CI.
diff budget-av.c.orig budget-av.c
1175c1175
ciintf_init(budget_av);
---
//ciintf_init(budget_av);
Could you please try
On 8/17/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allthough this patch is still in the queue of required patches. I
would still like to see that one upstream since it would be required
by a few drivers for checking if they're really idle.
I agree with Obi, Mkrufky and
Allthough this patch is still in the queue of required patches. I
would still like to see that one upstream since it would be required
by a few drivers for checking if they're really idle.
I agree with Obi, Mkrufky and Christoph. It seems to be better to handle
lock control inside your
If it was not by Markus' effort, I couldn't use my Xceive based
board, so I support his initiative. And as far as I know, he's the only
programmer working on this specific tuner.
To sum up: there's no time to waste. Linux needs more code and
less discussion.
Code
Em Ter, 2007-08-14 às 13:54 +0200, Markus Rechberger escreveu:
Since this didn't get commented here, Trent did that patch already 2
months ago but it's not included yet. So I recommend to include his
patch.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/543689
Acked-by: Markus Rechberger
Binary releases? Not from myself or Hauppauge. Period. Mark my words,
you will not see Hauppauge push binary junk at people just because we
want Linux support. That's the kind of thing marketing people like to do
and it has no respect within the community.
Acked.
Besides, who needs all
Dâniel Fraga wrote:
While the developers discuss these things, the users are waiting forever.
You make it sound as if its a case of bureaucrats discussing policy
before opening the bread line.
And i think that if Linux really wants
to support well most of the devices, something should be
hermann pitton wrote:
No need to upgrade, since you have already updated to recent v4l-dvb
code. You might try the attached patch, which sets the other atenna
input during digital usage and check if DVB-T reception
is /unchanged/better/worse.
I've tried your patch for 6/7 hours.
It works
Oliver Endriss wrote:
Johannes Deisenhofer wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of KNC1 DVB-S Plus Cards, with Subsystem ID 1894:0015.
There are 'Plus' cards, with Phillips SD1878 Tuner and Analog Inputs.
(Picture at http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/Bild:Knc1splusx4.jpg)
Is 'KNC1 DVB-S plus X4'
On 8/17/07, CityK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dâniel Fraga wrote:
I've been exchanging e-mails with Markus for months and he
supported very well my board (cx88 chip with xc2028 tuner).
Yes, Markus is very good (exceptionally good in fact) with helping users.
But at the same time,
Dâniel Fraga wrote:
I've been exchanging e-mails with Markus for months and he
supported very well my board (cx88 chip with xc2028 tuner).
Yes, Markus is very good (exceptionally good in fact) with helping users.
But at the same time, I noticed that there's a disagreement
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Oliver Endriss wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Since this didn't get commented here, Trent did that patch already 2
months ago but it's not included yet. So I recommend to include his
patch.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/543689
Acked-by: Markus
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
The ts_bus_ctrl function pointer / callback is already in the mainline,
check dvb_frontend.c for more details. You shouldn't need a patch from me.
ACK, should be enough to do this kind of
anyway it's history; we shouldn't waste more time on discussing what
happened .. we could fill weeks by doing that.
So to clear up some things:
* regarding binary userspace drivers, if someone wants to write binary
drivers he can do that already if he has enough knowledge and time,
even without
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
The ts_bus_ctrl function pointer / callback is already in the
mainline,
check dvb_frontend.c for more details. You shouldn't need a
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
The ts_bus_ctrl function pointer / callback is already in the
mainline,
check dvb_frontend.c for more
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Oliver Endriss wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Since this didn't get commented here, Trent did that patch already 2
months ago but it's not included yet. So I recommend to include his
patch.
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
The ts_bus_ctrl function pointer / callback is
On 8/17/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/17/07, Oliver Endriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Toth
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Endriss wrote:
ts_bus_ctrl does a kind of reference counting.
For readers:
- fe-ops.ts_bus_ctrl(fe,1) is called during open
- fe-ops.ts_bus_ctrl(fe,0) is called during close
For the one and only writer:
- fe-ops.ts_bus_ctrl(fe,1) is called during open
-
On 8/17/07, Andreas Oberritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Endriss wrote:
ts_bus_ctrl does a kind of reference counting.
For readers:
- fe-ops.ts_bus_ctrl(fe,1) is called during open
- fe-ops.ts_bus_ctrl(fe,0) is called during close
For the one and only writer:
-
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:29:41 +0200
Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also some responsibility by the users:
Users should THINK before they buy unsupported devices. If possible
buy devices that are supported by mainline.
This is the only way we can convince manufactures to contribute
e9hack wrote:
Oliver Endriss schrieb:
Jukka Pirinen wrote:
As workaround I commented out initialisation of CI interface, that's not
a problem because I don't have CI.
diff budget-av.c.orig budget-av.c
1175c1175
ciintf_init(budget_av);
---
//ciintf_init(budget_av);
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:15:21 -0400
CityK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While supporting most devices is an admirable goal (and one which I
certainly subscribe to) , what makes you think that pushing something
through just for the sake of supporting it is the right course of
action? Does Linux
Johannes Deisenhofer wrote:
Oliver Endriss wrote:
Johannes Deisenhofer wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of KNC1 DVB-S Plus Cards, with Subsystem ID 1894:0015.
There are 'Plus' cards, with Phillips SD1878 Tuner and Analog Inputs.
(Picture at
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Oliver Endriss wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Oliver Endriss wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Since this didn't get commented here, Trent did that patch already 2
months ago but it's not included yet. So I recommend to include his
patch.
Oliver Endriss schrieb:
Most of the debi requests are done with an spinlock held.
None of the debiread/write accesses in budget-av uses locks,
which is probably a bug. See the other thread.
Your are right, but sometimes it is called with nobusyloop = 0.
saa7146_wait_for_debi_done() is
Hi,
Dâniel Fraga schrieb:
Well... if I was a developer, I would knew why I'm doing this.
And I would accept the challenge (Man who plays golf in rain get wet
balls). So, developing drivers isn't just write code, but to interact
with users and see what's their problems. We, the users,
please stop hijacking the userspace tuner thread. I know pretty well
what potential is behind a discussion I could spend weeks just with
discussing things which are taken to serious here.
As from my point I take things serious if there's no other way
available _at the moment_ where a solution gets
Hi,
This patch updates initial tuning data of all transmitters stated at
http://www.digitv.fi/sivu.asp?path=1;8224;9519 . Some of this
information is preliminary(marked with red and blue) and might be wrong
as far as tuning parameters are concerned.
As a side-effect, fi-Kaihuanvaara has been
35 matches
Mail list logo
