Using the OM5776 eval board, and using the algorithm published
in the rev 1.1.0 datasheet, I find I am getting an I2C NAK,
which does not go away and requires a chip reset to restore
any I2C communication, after successfully writing EP4 (r06) in the
'image rejection cal pt I, wanted signal
DS == David Santinoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS Please get real. While you have all the right to choose to run a
DS mail server on a dynamic IP address, you cannot force your policy
DS on the recipients. Considering that the overwhelming majority of
DS the SMTP connections from dynamic
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:41:02AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Many dynamic addresses listed by by SORBS are in fact statically
assigned. In SORBS-terminology, dynamic means owner of address does
not control reverse DNS for address.
This has more to do with that particular list's policy (and
On 11/1/07, MikeW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the OM5776 eval board, and using the algorithm published
in the rev 1.1.0 datasheet, I find I am getting an I2C NAK,
which does not go away and requires a chip reset to restore
any I2C communication, after successfully writing EP4 (r06) in the
Michael Krufky mkrufky at linuxtv.org writes:
On 11/1/07, MikeW xx_ at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Using the OM5776 eval board, and using the algorithm published
in the rev 1.1.0 datasheet, I find I am getting an I2C NAK,
which does not go away and requires a chip reset to restore
any I2C
2007/11/1, David Santinoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If my server got listed for the reason above I'd rather put my efforts
in getting a decent reverse lookup, as this is likely to cause problems
well beyond a rejection by SORBS.
My server is blacklisted because all my ISP dynamic pool IPs are
Hi Tomi,
Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi,
AFAICS, all channels work here. The remote control also mostly works:
the OK and the blue button don't generate the proper lirc events.
I've fixed the remote control key codes as they have been in the original
Cinergy T2 driver with the attached
Hi,
I'm trying to get my TwinHann Starbox (7021) to work but the driver is
looking for the firmware dvb-usb-vp702x-02.fw but I can only find
dvb-usb-vp702x-01.fw. Does anyone know where I can get a hold of the
-02 firmware?
Thanks,
Greg Suarez
___
Steve,
Does this mean you will be working on an alternative to MultiProto?
As an HVR4000 user I am following this thread closely as you might imagine.
Ian
On 11/1/07, Steven Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Steven Toth wrote:
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi,
On Tue,
Greg Suarez wrote:
I'm trying to get my TwinHann Starbox (7021) to work but the driver is
looking for the firmware dvb-usb-vp702x-02.fw but I can only find
dvb-usb-vp702x-01.fw. Does anyone know where I can get a hold of the
-02 firmware?
Found it on a German forum:
Ian Bonham wrote:
Steve,
Does this mean you will be working on an alternative to MultiProto?
As an HVR4000 user I am following this thread closely as you might imagine.
Ian
Most likely yes.
- Steve
___
linux-dvb mailing list
Il Thursday 01 November 2007 20:36:36 Steven Toth ha scritto:
Ian Bonham wrote:
Steve,
Does this mean you will be working on an alternative to
MultiProto? As an HVR4000 user I am following this thread closely
as you might imagine.
Ian
Most likely yes.
- Steve
I really hope there
Am Samstag, den 20.10.2007, 00:41 +0200 schrieb hermann pitton:
Am Samstag, den 20.10.2007, 00:04 +0200 schrieb Hans-Georg Friedmann:
Hans-Georg Friedmann schrieb:
Hi folks :-)
Yesterday I upgraded the kernel of my c't-VDR 6 to 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch3,
then
to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 20:52:59 +0300, Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi,
AFAICS, all channels work here. The remote control also mostly works:
the OK and the blue button don't generate the proper lirc events.
I've fixed the remote control key codes as they have been in the original
Cinergy T2
On 11/2/07, Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/07, Nico Sabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il Thursday 01 November 2007 20:36:36 Steven Toth ha scritto:
Ian Bonham wrote:
Steve,
Does this mean you will be working on an alternative to
MultiProto? As an HVR4000 user I
On 11/1/07, Nico Sabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il Thursday 01 November 2007 20:36:36 Steven Toth ha scritto:
Ian Bonham wrote:
Steve,
Does this mean you will be working on an alternative to
MultiProto? As an HVR4000 user I am following this thread closely
as you might imagine.
Oliver Endriss wrote:
@all users of saa7146-based cards
(drivers: dvb-ttpci, budget, budget-ci, budget-av)
Please test whether the attached patch has any negative effects.
Two fixes for the 'saa7146_wait_for_debi_done' code:
(a) Timeout did not work when the routine was called with
e9hack wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes the not working ber counting of the tda10021
frontend.
- Hartmut
Committed to HG. Thanks.
CU
Oliver
--
VDR Remote Plugin 0.4.0: http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/vdr/
e9hack wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes the increasing of the signal strength value (higher
value = higher signal
strength) and scales the value to the range of 0... The charcteristic
itself is wrong. To get
proper values on a TT-C2300 in the range of 40..60% real signal strength,
José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues wrote:
2007/11/1, David Santinoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If my server got listed for the reason above I'd rather put my efforts
in getting a decent reverse lookup, as this is likely to cause problems
well beyond a rejection by SORBS.
My server is blacklisted
Oliver Endriss wrote:
@all users of ves1820-based DVB-C cards (FF ttpci, budget),
please test whether the attached patch has any adverse effects.
(Tests @vdr-portal did not show any problems yet.)
It changes the acquisition range for clock recovery from 120 ppm to
240ppm. Apparently, some
Oliver Endriss wrote:
e9hack wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes the increasing of the signal strength value
(higher value = higher signal
strength).
If nobody objects I'll commit this patch.
Committed to HG. Thanks.
CU
Oliver
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
