Am Mittwoch 28 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari:
> Christoph Pfister wrote:
> > The proposed splitting is a bit problematic, because you have specific
> > entries and a "fallback" (maybe cause some confusion among users). And
> > it is hard to check as I _quite_ soon realised.
>
> "fallbacks"
Christoph Pfister wrote:
> 2007/11/22, Antti Palosaari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> hei
>> I got current channel list from operator and make & update files against
>> it. New tuning files attached. There is also list I got from the operator.
>>
>> List of all 3KTV networks and proper tuning file:
>> ope
2007/11/22, Antti Palosaari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hei
> I got current channel list from operator and make & update files against
> it. New tuning files attached. There is also list I got from the operator.
>
> List of all 3KTV networks and proper tuning file:
> operator reference channels fi-3KTV
Christoph Pfister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (sorry for the late reply)
no problem :)
>
> Am Dienstag 13 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari:
>> hello
>> There is file containing reference channels used in 3KTV networks around
>> the Finland. There is about 20 3KTV networks but all didn't use exactly
>>
Hi,
(sorry for the late reply)
Am Dienstag 13 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari:
> hello
> There is file containing reference channels used in 3KTV networks around
> the Finland. There is about 20 3KTV networks but all didn't use exactly
> same channel list for reason or other.
>
> Now there
hello
There is file containing reference channels used in 3KTV networks around
the Finland. There is about 20 3KTV networks but all didn't use exactly
same channel list for reason or other.
Now there is fi-Rauma and fi-Salo that contains same channels, should
those removed?
fi-3ktv (replace
