Oliver Endriss wrote:
Janne Grunau wrote:
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't
result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
Besides following changes in dvb-core and dvb-usb core the patch adds to
all drivers
...
While I don't care much whether there
On Sunday 05 August 2007 06:01:46 Oliver Endriss wrote:
Janne Grunau wrote:
Hi,
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging)
doesn't result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
Besides following changes in dvb-core and dvb-usb core the patch
adds to all drivers
On Saturday 04 August 2007 07:00:42 you wrote:
On 8/4/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/07, Michael Krufky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote:
Do we
Janne Grunau wrote:
Hi,
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't
result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate
static minor numbers per driver.
Attached patch adds a similiar mechanism to
On 8/2/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't
result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate
static minor numbers per driver.
Attached patch
On Friday 03 August 2007 21:28:01 Michael Krufky wrote:
I say Janne should continue on and convert the rest of the drivers...
Is anybody opposed?
done
Janne
Adds adapter_nr module parameter to all dvb drivers to specify the
preferred allocation of device minor numbers per driver.
Manu Abraham wrote:
On 8/2/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't
result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
V4L drivers have the {radio|vbi|video}_nr module options to allocate
static minor numbers per
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote:
Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ?
IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that.
I think it's worthwhile to have it.
Is there any other possible better alternatives ?
Something similiar is possible with
On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote:
Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ?
IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that.
I think it's worthwhile to have it.
Is there any other possible
Manu Abraham wrote:
On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote:
Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ?
IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that.
I think it's worthwhile to have it.
Is there any other
On 8/4/07, Michael Krufky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote:
Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ?
IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:15:04AM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote:
Dynamic loading of modules by udev on startup (aka coldplugging) doesn't
result in deterministic dvb adapter numbers.
Isn't the usual response to write some udev rules to set the name
based on device characteristics? Thus taking the
12 matches
Mail list logo
