On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 16:31:59 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
> Please stop sending EFI patches if you can't be bothered to
> test/reproduce against the EFI tree.
um, sorry, but that's a bit strong. Finding (let alone fixing) a bug
in EFI is a great contribution (thanks!) and the EFI maintainers
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:30:36 + David Howells wrote:
> Here's a set of patches to institute a "locked-down mode" in the kernel and
> to trigger that mode if the kernel is booted in secure-boot mode or through
> the command line.
>
> Enabling CONFIG_LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL makes
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:07:44 + Will Deacon wrote:
> > I should note that this change should not affect any memblock users
> > that never set the MEMBLOCK_NOMAP flag, but please, if you see any
> > issues beyond 'this may conflict with other stuff we have queued for
> >
(void *buf, size_t bufsz)
+{
+ size_t sz = get_efi_runtime_map_size();
+
+ if (sz bufsz)
+ sz = bufsz;
+
+ memcpy(buf, efi_runtime_map, sz);
+ return 0;
+}
Could we prefix these with efi_, e.g. efi_get_runtime_map_size() ?
This?
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime.
It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a kexec
patch which actually hits on efi and x86.
I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:11:33 -0800
Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Building linux-next today (tag next-20130212) I get the following errors when
building arch/ia64/configs/{tiger_defconfig, zx1_defconfig, bigsur_defconfig,
sim_defconfig}
arch/ia64/mm/init.c: In function
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:11:33 -0800
Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Building linux-next today (tag next-20130212) I get the following errors when
building arch/ia64/configs/{tiger_defconfig, zx1_defconfig, bigsur_defconfig,
sim_defconfig}
arch/ia64/mm/init.c: In function