Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-07-28 at 14:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Safonov
> > Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 17:26:55 +0100
> >
> > > Well, I think, I'll rework my patches set according to critics and
> > > separate compat xfrm layer. I've already a selftest to check that
Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> 1. It will double copy netlink messages, making it O(n) instead of
> O(1), where n - is number of bind()s.. Probably we don't care much.
About those bind() patches, I don't understand why they are needed.
Why can't you just add the compat skb to the native skb when doing
Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> So, here I add a compatible layer to xfrm.
> As xfrm uses netlink notifications, kernel should send them in ABI
> format that an application will parse. The proposed solution is
> to save the ABI of bind() syscall. The realization detail is
> to create kernel-hidden, non
