On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:02:23PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 12:26 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>>This does make the kernel boot, but we suspect that there may be
> >>>another problem. We need to investigate it, but we have a suspicion
> >>>that the EFI stub is trying to allocate from
On 10/28/2015 12:26 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>This does make the kernel boot, but we suspect that there may be
>another problem. We need to investigate it, but we have a suspicion
>that the EFI stub is trying to allocate from the Runtime Data block,
>and the alignment adjustment "fixes" the probl
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:11:57PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 09:06 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >index 816120ece6bc..a60ce249cfc0 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stu
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:11:57PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 09:06 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >index 816120ece6bc..a60ce249cfc0 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi
On 10/27/2015 09:06 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
index 816120ece6bc..a60ce249cfc0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@
* Mustang), we can still place
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:13:22PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >No. I screwed up the patch since the trailing ) should not be there,
> >but we do need to round first, and only then add the offset.
>
> But if the offset is not a multiple of 2MB, won't the address passed
> to
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
No. I screwed up the patch since the trailing ) should not be there,
but we do need to round first, and only then add the offset.
But if the offset is not a multiple of 2MB, won't the address passed to
allocate_pages be unaligned? I'll test your patch on our system, but
On 28 October 2015 at 11:10, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> + *image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) +
>> + TEXT_OFFSET);
>
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> *image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_b
Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
+ *image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_base, SZ_2M) +
+ TEXT_OFFSET);
Shouldn't this be:
*image_addr = *reserve_addr = round_up(dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET, SZ_2M);
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualco
On 28 October 2015 at 06:24, Timur Tabi wrote:
> From: Shanker Donthineni
>
> The vmlinux image load address must be aligned to 2MB, as documented
> in Documentation/arm64/booting.txt. Otherwise, __create_page_tables
> in head.S will create incorrect page table entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker
From: Shanker Donthineni
The vmlinux image load address must be aligned to 2MB, as documented
in Documentation/arm64/booting.txt. Otherwise, __create_page_tables
in head.S will create incorrect page table entries.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
---
arch/arm64/kern
11 matches
Mail list logo
