On Fri, 09 Jan, at 10:55:29AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> I disagree.
> The intent is clear, and you can not follow the current text and
> provide a version that does not do the right thing. Only the MapKey
> return is conditional on success.
Tianocore does in fact appear to set the descriptor vers
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:55:29AM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:19:50AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 07:09:22PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On 8 January 2015 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Hi Ard,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:19:50AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 07:09:22PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 8 January 2015 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Hi Ard,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:51:47PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >> This fixes two minor
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 07:09:22PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 8 January 2015 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:51:47PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> This fixes two minor issues in the implementation of get_memory_map():
> >> - Currently, it ass
On 8 January 2015 at 19:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:51:47PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> This fixes two minor issues in the implementation of get_memory_map():
>> - Currently, it assumes that sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t) == desc_size,
>> which is usually true
Hi Ard,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:51:47PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This fixes two minor issues in the implementation of get_memory_map():
> - Currently, it assumes that sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t) == desc_size,
> which is usually true, but not mandated by the spec. (This was added
> inten
This fixes two minor issues in the implementation of get_memory_map():
- Currently, it assumes that sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t) == desc_size,
which is usually true, but not mandated by the spec. (This was added
intentionally to allow future additions to the definition of
efi_memory_desc_t). The
