(Pulling in Peter and Stephen)
On Tue, 29 Apr, at 11:28:17AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
contains both generic and arm64 patches? And there are dependencies
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:43:56PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
(Pulling in Peter and Stephen)
On Tue, 29 Apr, at 11:28:17AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
On 04/29/2014 04:43 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
(Pulling in Peter and Stephen)
On Tue, 29 Apr, at 11:28:17AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
The patches look fine to me, they've been through several rounds of
review already. How do we propose these get merged as the series
contains both generic and
On 04/29/2014 06:47 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Waiting for the tip/x86/efi to be merged first is not a problem. We
also need a stable base for testing the arm64 UEFI series, so I assume
this series can be based onto tip/x86/efi (would such branch be rebased
before hitting mainline?).
On Tue, 29 Apr, at 02:47:28PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Waiting for the tip/x86/efi to be merged first is not a problem. We
also need a stable base for testing the arm64 UEFI series, so I assume
this series can be based onto tip/x86/efi (would such branch be rebased
before hitting mainline?).
On Tue, 29 Apr, at 07:56:20AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I'm wondering if it would be better to organize it into a separate topic
branch. We can still take it through tip, if you want, but it would be
better than putting it all into one tree.
Sure, that makes sense. I'll do that.
--
Matt
This set adds support for UEFI to the arm64 port - a stub loader, as
well as runtime services support for efivars.
It depends on some core EFI patches currently in linux-next.
This includes bits shared between arm and arm64 support.
Remaining bits required for arm support will be submitted
