On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:04:48PM +, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 11:31:02PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Actually, looking again at the original patch, it appears that my
analysis was incorrect regarding the possibility that the loop would
never terminate. The only thing that
On 14 Feb 2015, at 00:04, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 11:31:02PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Actually, looking again at the original patch, it appears that my
analysis was incorrect regarding the possibility that the loop would
never terminate. The only
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 11:31:02PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Actually, looking again at the original patch, it appears that my
analysis was incorrect regarding the possibility that the loop would
never terminate. The only thing that could happen if desc_size
sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t) is that you
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for instance, when using Tianocore's preallocated region
feature. For example,
On 12 February 2015 at 18:22, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:39:46AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 18:22, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (),
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for instance, when using Tianocore's preallocated region
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into more than 1 occupied region + 2 free
regions.
So no, I don't think it is ...
I don't think that's a guarantee we can make, nor is it something
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into more than 1 occupied region + 2 free
regions.
So no, I don't think
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:56:51PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into
On 12 February 2015 at 23:16, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:56:51PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a
11 matches
Mail list logo
