On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for instance, when using Tianocore's preallocated region
feature. For example,
On 12 February 2015 at 18:22, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:39:46AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 18:22, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:24:19AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (),
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
As it turns out, when allocating room for the UEFI memory map using
UEFI's AllocatePool (), it may result in two new memory map entries
being created, for instance, when using Tianocore's preallocated region
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into more than 1 occupied region + 2 free
regions.
So no, I don't think it is ...
I don't think that's a guarantee we can make, nor is it something
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into more than 1 occupied region + 2 free
regions.
So no, I don't think
On Wed, 11 Feb, at 11:29:58AM, Peter Jones wrote:
From grub's point of view I'm not sure why we'd care - the pages kernel
and initramfs land in are both from the Boot Services allocator, so if the
machine doesn't support high addresses, they won't be there.
It's not that some implementations
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:56:51PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a single allocation could result in a single
free region to be split into
On 12 February 2015 at 23:16, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:56:51PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 22:47, Matt Fleming m...@codeblueprint.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb, at 06:39:46PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
I don't see how doing a
