On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 01:13, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
> interpretation of the EFI Memory Types as "reserved for a specific
> purpose". The intent of this bit is to allow the OS to identify precious
> or scarce memory resources and
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:55 PM Matthew Garrett
wrote:
>
> From: Matthew Garrett
>
> UEFI systems provide a boot services protocol for obtaining the TPM
> event log, but this is unusable after ExitBootServices() is called.
> Unfortunately ExitBootServices() itself triggers additional TPM events
On Friday, May 31, 2019 12:59:27 AM CEST Dan Williams wrote:
> As a single source file object there is no need for the hmat enabling to
> have its own directory.
Well, I asked Keith to add that directory as the code in hmat.c is more related
to mm than to
the rest of the ACPI subsystem.
Is
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 18:04, wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203761
>
> Bug ID: 203761
>Summary: efivar_ssdt_iter is subject to stack corruption when
> the input name_size is 0
>Product: EFI
>Version:
(cc Mike for memblock)
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 01:13, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
> interpretation of the EFI Memory Types as "reserved for a special
> purpose".
>
> The proposed Linux behavior for specific purpose memory is that it is
>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:24 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2019 12:59:27 AM CEST Dan Williams wrote:
> > As a single source file object there is no need for the hmat enabling to
> > have its own directory.
>
> Well, I asked Keith to add that directory as the code in hmat.c is
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:56 PM Matthew Garrett
wrote:
>
> Identical to previous version except without the KSAN workaround - Ard
> has a better solution for that.
I just tested this on x86_64 with the systemd-boot (previously gummiboot)
bootloader. For context, this bootloader is essentially
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 17:28, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> wrote:
> >
> > (cc Mike for memblock)
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 01:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
> > > interpretation
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
>
> (cc Mike for memblock)
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 01:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > UEFI 2.8 defines an EFI_MEMORY_SP attribute bit to augment the
> > interpretation of the EFI Memory Types as "reserved for a special
> > purpose".
> >
>
Compiling a kernel with W=1 generates this warning,
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c:731:16: warning: comparison of unsigned
expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits]
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:03 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
> > The input of name_size is signed long, gets compared against an unsigned
> > long
> > of a fixed size, then stored as a signed int (this is mostly okay because of
> > the known max size), but it then gets passed to a function takes
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 17:28, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:30 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > (cc Mike for memblock)
> > >
> > > On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 01:13, Dan Williams
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
12 matches
Mail list logo
