On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 08:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Hi all,
I've been messing with UEFI booting a kernel and then later on, using
kexec to boot another kernel, and noticed that the kexec'ed kernel is
not really
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:26:02PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Provide a single call to allow kernel code to determine whether the system
has been configured to either disable module loading entirely or to load
only modules signed with a trusted key.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Garrett matthew.garr...@nebula.com
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, jwbo...@redhat.com, keesc...@chromium.org,
Matthew Garrett
matthew.garr...@nebula.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:26:09 PM
Subject: [PATCH V2
- Original Message -
From: Lenny Szubowicz lszub...@redhat.com
To: Matthew Garrett matthew.garr...@nebula.com,
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, jwbo...@redhat.com, keesc...@chromium.org
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:57:36 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:22 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/19/2013 09:10 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
+ if (!capable(CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL))
+ return -EPERM;
+
Stale bits?
Yeah. Did I manage to send out the old copy of that again? I'm sorry,
spending a few months
On 08/29/2013 11:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:22 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/19/2013 09:10 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
+ if (!capable(CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL))
+ return -EPERM;
+
Stale bits?
Yeah. Did I manage to send out the old copy of that
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:46 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/29/2013 11:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:22 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/19/2013 09:10 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
+ if (!capable(CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL))
+ return -EPERM;
+
Stale
On 08/29/2013 11:49 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
No, you mixed and matched in a single patch...
Right, but I'd fixed that in V2 (which I see I *did* send correctly, and
you're just replying to the old one :))
Well, I'm responding to the one that was sent 31 minutes ago.
-hpa
--
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 12:05 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/29/2013 11:49 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
No, you mixed and matched in a single patch...
Right, but I'd fixed that in V2 (which I see I *did* send correctly, and
you're just replying to the old one :))
Well, I'm
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:18:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Hi all,
I've been messing with UEFI booting a kernel and then later on, using
kexec to boot another kernel, and noticed that the kexec'ed kernel is
not
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:35:23PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 08:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
Hi all,
I've been messing with UEFI booting a kernel and then later on, using
kexec to
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:05:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/29/2013 11:49 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
No, you mixed and matched in a single patch...
Right, but I'd fixed that in V2 (which I see I *did* send correctly, and
you're just replying to the old one :))
Well, I'm
於 四，2013-08-29 於 23:32 +0200，Pavel Machek 提到：
Hi!
- Bootloader store the public key to EFI boottime variable by itself
- Bootloader put The private key to S4SignKey EFI variable for
forward to
kernel.
Is the UEFI NVRAM really suited for such regular updates?
13 matches
Mail list logo
