look further into the options I have set in my kernel build, I may have
changed something else without remembering between booting with and
without the CSM enabled.
It could also be that the non-CSM BIOS somehow remaps the CMOS registers.
I don't believe there is anything which
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:38:31AM +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I don't believe there is anything which prevents the CSM from faking a
CMOS clock using SMM from whatever is actually in the hardware.
HPET in SMM? Oh, sure, definitely.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 12:38:31 One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
look further into the options I have set in my kernel
build, I may have changed something else without
remembering between booting with and without the CSM
enabled.
It could also be that the non-CSM BIOS somehow
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel
On 11 November 2014 18:44, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:55:24PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 11 November 2014 18:44, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard
