2015-10-09 12:10 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon :
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:12:24AM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> 2015-10-08 22:02 GMT+03:00 Ard Biesheuvel :
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
>> > @@ -59,4 +59,31
On 10/08/2015 07:07 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2015-10-08 18:11 GMT+03:00 Catalin Marinas :
>> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:09:26PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 8 October 2015 at 13:23, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
On 10/08/2015 02:11 PM,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:32:18PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
[...]
> I thought the EFI stub isolation patches create a copy of mem*() functions in
> the stub,
> but they are just create aliases with __efistub_ prefix.
>
> We only need to create some more aliases for KASAN.
> The following
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:40:21PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2015-10-09 12:10 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon :
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 11:12:24AM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> >> 2015-10-08 22:02 GMT+03:00 Ard Biesheuvel :
> >> > ---
2015-10-09 12:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Rutland :
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:32:18PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I thought the EFI stub isolation patches create a copy of mem*() functions
>> in the stub,
>> but they are just create aliases with __efistub_ prefix.
>>
2015-10-08 22:02 GMT+03:00 Ard Biesheuvel :
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
> @@ -59,4 +59,31 @@
> _kernel_offset_le = DATA_LE64(TEXT_OFFSET); \
> _kernel_flags_le= DATA_LE64(__HEAD_FLAGS);
>
>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:18:09PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2015-10-09 12:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Rutland :
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:32:18PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> I thought the EFI stub isolation patches create a copy of mem*() functions
>
2015-10-09 15:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Rutland :
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:18:09PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> 2015-10-09 12:48 GMT+03:00 Mark Rutland :
>> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:32:18PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> >> I