On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 16:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 15:33, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> > On 1/26/19 1:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> Am 26.01.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel
> > >> :
> > >>
> > >>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 13:27, Heinrich
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 15:33, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 1/26/19 1:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Am 26.01.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel :
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 13:27, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> On 1/26/19 11:22 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
On 1/26/19 1:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Am 26.01.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel :
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 13:27, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 1/26/19 11:22 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
The UEFI spec revision 2.7 errata A section 8.4 has the following to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 11:46, Hedi Berriche wrote:
>
> Calls into UV firmware must be protected against concurrency, use the
> now visible efi_runtime_sem lock to serialise them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche
> Reviewed-by: Russ Anderson
> Reviewed-by: Mike Travis
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 11:46, Hedi Berriche wrote:
>
> uv_bios_call_reentrant() has no callers nor is it exported, kill it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche
> Reviewed-by: Russ Anderson
> Reviewed-by: Mike Travis
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich
> Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl
Please drop these
Hello Hedi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 11:46, Hedi Berriche wrote:
>
> Make efi_runtime_lock semaphore global so that it can be used by EFI
> runtime callers that may be defined outside efi/runtime-wrappers.c.
>
> The immediate motivation is to piggy-back it to serialise UV platform BIOS
> calls.
>
>
> Am 26.01.2019 um 13:28 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel :
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 13:27, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/26/19 11:22 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> The UEFI spec revision 2.7 errata A section 8.4 has the following to
>>> say about the virtual memory runtime services:
>>>
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 13:27, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 1/26/19 11:22 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The UEFI spec revision 2.7 errata A section 8.4 has the following to
> > say about the virtual memory runtime services:
> >
> > "This section contains function definitions for the virtual
On 1/26/19 11:22 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The UEFI spec revision 2.7 errata A section 8.4 has the following to
> say about the virtual memory runtime services:
>
> "This section contains function definitions for the virtual memory
> support that may be optionally used by an operating
The UEFI spec revision 2.7 errata A section 8.4 has the following to
say about the virtual memory runtime services:
"This section contains function definitions for the virtual memory
support that may be optionally used by an operating system at runtime.
If an operating system chooses to
10 matches
Mail list logo