On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:45 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
The x86/AMD64 EFI stubs must us a call wrapper to convert between
the Linux and EFI ABIs, so void pointers are sufficient. For ARM,
the ABIs are compatible, so we can directly invoke the function
pointers. The functions that are used by the
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
* Change FDT memory allocation to retry with a larger allocation if
first educated guess is inadequate.
With this change, it looks like you no longer free the original cmdline
and fdt memory. The current flow looks like:
retry:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
+static int relocate_kernel(efi_system_table_t *sys_table,
+ unsigned long *zimage_addr,
+ unsigned long zimage_size,
+ unsigned long min_addr, unsigned long max_addr)
(-)
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
2 unused labels
1 value computed is not used
Signed-off-by: Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body
...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
This #define is only used the the shared code, so move
it there.
Signed-off-by: Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
by the ARM stub are updated
to match the EFI definitions.
Signed-off-by: Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
to initrd images.
Signed-off-by: Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:26 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org
---
drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c | 17 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Tested on arm64.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 16:31 +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 03:07:39PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
+/*
+ * If you need to (temporarily) support buggy firmware.
+ */
+#define KEEP_BOOT_SERVICES_REGIONS
Have you seen firmware that requires this? I'm just curious
and the prerequisite patches is at:
git://github.com/mosalter/linux.git (arm64-efi-patches branch)
Mark Salter (3):
arm64: add EFI stub
doc: arm64: add description of EFI stub support
arm64: add EFI runtime services
Documentation/arm64/booting.txt | 4 +
Documentation/efi-stub.txt | 10
. Support in the COFF header
for signed images was provided by Ard Biesheuvel.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
CC: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
CC: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
CC: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
This patch adds EFI runtime support for arm64. The runtime support allows the
kernel to access various EFI runtime services provided by EFI firmware. Things
like reboot, real time clock, EFI boot variables, and others.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
CC: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 14:18 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:05:10PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
This patch adds PE/COFF header fields to the start of the Image
so that it appears as an EFI application to EFI firmware. An EFI
stub is included to allow direct booting
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:25 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I lost track of the early_ioremap status for arm/arm64? Was there more
progress since October (I think)?
See the two patch series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/474
and
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/27/621
The latter
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:25 +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:28:06 +, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:43:23PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 14:18 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:05
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:38 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:34:30AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
Or just disable runtime services on the switch to big ending. Big endian
should not disable the stub (but getting it to work could be a follow-up
patch)
The other
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 15:25 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:05:12PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
+
+#define efi_remap(cookie, size) __ioremap((cookie), (size),
PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC)
+#define efi_ioremap(cookie, size) __ioremap((cookie), (size
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 14:18 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:05:10PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
+#include linux/linkage.h
+#include linux/init.h
+
+#include asm/assembler.h
+
+#define EFI_LOAD_ERROR 0x8001
It's defined already but I
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 14:52 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Apologies for late feedback.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 05:05:12PM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..1bad8a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 11:32 +, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec, at 12:02:27PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:39:03AM +, Matt Fleming wrote:
Leif, Mark, does this patch look OK for ARM? We'd need to introduce a
new early_memunmap() function so that things still
to use.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c| 48 +-
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 5 +
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 5 ++---
include/linux/efi.h| 6 ++
4 files changed, 24 insertions
There are a lot of places in the kernel which iterate through an
EFI memory map. Most of these places use essentially the same
for-loop code. This patch adds a for_each_efi_memory_desc()
helper to clean up all of the existing duplicate code and avoid
more in the future.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 15:17 +, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan, at 05:29:05PM, Mark Salter wrote:
There are a lot of places in the kernel which iterate through an
EFI memory map. Most of these places use essentially the same
for-loop code. This patch adds a for_each_efi_memory_desc
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 18:28 +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:55AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
+/* Macro for setting/clearing bits in sctlr */
+ .macro update_sctlr, set:req, clear:req, tmp:req, tmp2:req
+ mrc p15, 0, \tmp, c1, c0,
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:17 +, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb, at 05:03:54PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
From: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
ARM and ARM64 architectures use the device tree to pass UEFI parameters
from stub to kernel. These parameters are things known to the stub
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 12:34 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47:06PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
[...]
+/*
+ * Called from setup_arch with interrupts disabled.
+ */
+void __init efi_enter_virtual_mode(void)
[...]
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 12:09 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47:04PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-entry.S
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+/*
+ * EFI entry point.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat, Inc.
+ * Author: Mark Salter
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 02:40:29PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 12:09 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:47:04PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:57 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:40:31PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
If UEFI doesn't handle the caches, the only thing left to EFI_STUB is to
flush by MVA. We don't need to flush
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 16:01 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:13:18PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:57 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:40:31PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 18:28 +, Catalin Marinas
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
Now, the only difference between early_memremap() and early_ioremap(),
at least on x86, is PAGE_KERNEL vs. PAGE_KERNEL_IO, where PAGE_KERNEL_IO
has the additional _PAGE_BIT_IOMAP bit set in the pte. But that's a
software bit for x86.
I
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 09:09 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
Add handlers for arm_pm_resestart and pm_power_off which use EFI
typo.
runtime services ResetSystem call to perform the functions. These
handlers are only
simplifies the callsites since users no longer need to check to
see whether EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES are enabled.
Cc: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
Cc: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming matt.flem...@intel.com
---
Tested-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Mark, I
this for specific classes of hardware will be
submitted separately.
Cc: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming matt.flem...@intel.com
---
Tested-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 12:09 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
The current UEFI implementation for arm64 fails to preserve/restore the
contents
of the NEON register file,
Does the current implementation actually use NEON registers?
I know there are some at least, which build with
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:23 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This moves definitions depended upon both by code under arch/x86/boot and
under drivers/firmware/efi to asm/efi.h. This is in preparation of turning
the stub code under drivers/firmware/efi into a static library.
Signed-off-by: Ard
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 12:13 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 2 July 2014 12:10, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote:
We assign efi.systab using efi_lookup_mapped_addr(), and test for !NULL, but
then go on an dereference it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 12:16 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
If we cannot resolve the virtual address of the UEFI System Table, its
physical
offset must be missing from the virtual memory map, and there is really no
point
in proceeding with installing the virtual memory map and the runtime
services
dispatch table. So back out gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
---
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:02 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
@@ -273,6 +282,10 @@ static void __init free_boot_services(void)
continue;
}
+ /* Don't free anything below kernel */
+ if (md-phys_addr PHYS_OFFSET)
+
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 14:54 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:11:00AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:02 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
@@ -273,6 +282,10 @@ static void __init free_boot_services(void)
continue
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 16:28 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:04:37AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 15:49 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:23:26AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 14:54 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 18:50 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
The EFI loader may load Image at any available offset. This means Image may
reside very close to or at the base of DRAM, in which case the relocation
done by efi_entry() results in Image being moved up in memory, which is
undesirable
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 12:58 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
After the EFI stub has done its business, it jumps into the kernel by
branching
to offset #0 of the loaded Image, which is where it expects to find the header
containing a 'branch to stext' instruction.
However, the header is not
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:53 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:51:37PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 12:58 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
After the EFI stub has done its business, it jumps into the kernel by
branching
to offset #0 of the loaded Image
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 22:38 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 16 July 2014 21:45, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:53 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:51:37PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 12:58 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 23:13 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 16 July 2014 23:03, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 22:38 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 16 July 2014 21:45, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:53 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 18:08 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
(Argh, late reply due to broken mail filters.)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:13:48AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
Is the spin table area really allocated as BOOT_SERVICES_*?
No. It is EFI_RESERVED_TYPE. But if UEFI
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 11:15 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 12:49 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
From: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
In certain cases the cpu-release-addr of a CPU may not fall in the
linear mapping (e.g. when the kernel is loaded above this address due
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 17:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 11:15:45 Mark Salter wrote:
-
- __flush_dcache_area(release_addr, sizeof(release_addr[0]));
+ writeq_relaxed(__pa(secondary_holding_pen), release_addr);
+ __flush_dcache_area(release_addr
,
- PAGE_SIZE);
Can we make efi_relocate_kernel static inline to get rid
of the defined but unused warning?
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
+ status = efi_low_alloc(sys_table, kernel_memsize + TEXT_OFFSET
(-)
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
index 69dafe9621fd..dafc4f2c1ade 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ optional_header:
.short 0x20b
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 20:46 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 29 July 2014 20:27, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 20:17 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 29 July 2014 17:29, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 12:49 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel
-release-addr, enabling us to support
addresses regardless of whether they are covered by the linear
mapping.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
Tested-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
[ardb: added (__force void *) cast]
Signed-off-by: Ard
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 16:11 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
There are 2 interesting pieces of information in the UEFI spec section 2.3.6
regarding the mapping of runtime regions:
(a) the firmware should not request a virtual mapping for configuration
tables,
even though they are marked as
(-)
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-efi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 3 +--
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c | 10 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 5472c24..a83061f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 15:06 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:31:42PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
Commit 86c8b27a01cf:
arm64: ignore DT memreserve entries when booting in UEFI mode
prevents early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() from being called for
arm64
.
Change from v1:
* Acks added
* Fixed loop logic to remove reserved regions
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 3 +--
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
on 32-bit tablets,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84241#c21
Disable it explicitly for x86 so that we don't give users false hope
that this driver will work - it won't, and your machine is likely to
crash.
Cc: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
Cc: Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com
Cc
with the rest of the image if it needs to be
relocated, so I don't see an issue there. However, I do remember Mark
Salter mentioning that there is at least one other location that needs
to be fixed up if this concern is valid. Mark?
I think at one time we were using the the EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 08:30 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 October 2014 01:20, Roy Franz roy.fr...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 21:03 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 9 October 2014 19:23, Mark Rutland
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:21 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On systems that boot via UEFI, all memory nodes are deleted from the
device tree, and instead, the size and location of system RAM is derived
from the UEFI memory map. This is handled by reserve_regions, which not only
reserves parts of
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 19:20 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 22 October 2014 19:06, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:21 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On systems that boot via UEFI, all memory nodes are deleted from the
device tree, and instead, the size
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 16:54 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:21 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On systems that boot via UEFI, all memory nodes are deleted from the
device tree, and instead, the size and location
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on the contents of
the UEFI memory map. Formerly, all regions would be memblock_add()'ed,
after which unusable regions would be memblock_reserve()'d as well.
To simplify things, but also
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 13:57 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
b/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
index 98735fb43581..4b6a5c31629f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*/
#include
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 18:38 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 20 November 2014 18:28, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 13:57 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
b/drivers/firmware/efi/virtmap.c
index 98735fb43581..4b6a5c31629f
On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 13:07 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 20 November 2014 18:54, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 18:38 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 20 November 2014 18:28, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 13:57 +0100, Ard
;
+ }
memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize;
-
efi.memmap = memmap;
efi.systab = (__force void *)ioremap_cache(efi_system_table,
Somewhat unrelated but we should unmap memmap.map if the efi.systab
mapping fails.
Acked-by: Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 13:41 +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
arm64 early_ioremap/iounmap/memremap/memunmap are not supported beyond
the call to paging_init(), but arm64_enter_virtual_mode() (an early
initcall) makes one call to unmap the UEFI memory map.
Rearrange the code to unmap this region
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:09 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jun, at 03:14:54PM, Peter Jones wrote:
So, I'm told this problem exists in the world:
--
Subject: Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support'
Building ia64:defconfig
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 09:35 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This fixes two issues with the EFI libstub code that removes the memory
> nodes from the FDT:
> a) fdt_del_node() invalidates the iterator, so we should restart from the
>top after calling it;
> b) use fixed length of 6 when matching
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 18:56 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 7 October 2015 at 17:02, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 7 October 2015 at 16:49, Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 09:35 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:04 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 26 August 2015 at 15:24, Leif Lindholm leif.lindh...@linaro.org
wrote:
As we now have a common debug infrastructure between core and arm64
efi,
drop the bit of the interface passing verbose output flags around.
is means we also need to
> sort it first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
Tested-by: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com>
>
> As discussed off list, this is the arm64 side of what we shou
81 matches
Mail list logo
