On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel
On 11 November 2014 18:44, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:55:24PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 11 November 2014 18:44, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +, Mark Salter wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 10:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 08:31 +0100, Ard
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on the contents of
the UEFI memory map. Formerly, all regions would be memblock_add()'ed,
after which unusable regions would be memblock_reserve()'d as well.
To simplify things, but also
On 10 November 2014 05:11, Mark Salter msal...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 15:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on the contents of
the UEFI memory map. Formerly, all regions would be memblock_add()'ed,
after which unusable regions
This changes the way memblocks are installed based on the contents of
the UEFI memory map. Formerly, all regions would be memblock_add()'ed,
after which unusable regions would be memblock_reserve()'d as well.
To simplify things, but also to allow access to the unusable regions
through
