On Tue, 01 Jul, at 03:35:09PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> I agree, but I kind of followed the example of the Kconfig symbols in
> the vicinity.
> So sure, rip it out. Or would you like me to do a v(n+1)?
Thanks. Nah, no need for another version, I'ved fixed this up in 'next',
but please do check t
On 1 July 2014 15:30, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun, at 12:09:05PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> In order for other archs (such as arm64) to be able to reuse the virtual mode
>> function call wrappers, move them to drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
>
On Thu, 26 Jun, at 12:09:05PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> In order for other archs (such as arm64) to be able to reuse the virtual mode
> function call wrappers, move them to drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
[...]
> @@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ config EFI_PARAMS_FRO
In order for other archs (such as arm64) to be able to reuse the virtual mode
function call wrappers, move them to drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
---
arch/x86/Kconfig| 1 +
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 144 +--
