On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:09:45PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > From: James Bottomley <jbottom...@odin.com> > > This is necessary to allow sysfs operations to return error in close (we are > using close to initiate and return a possible error from a transaction). > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <jbottom...@odin.com>
Are there any side-affects now that we have a flush() call for binary files that the vfs will act differently from not defining one at all? if not, no objection to me for this change. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
