On 14 July 2018 at 13:41, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Did you have any thoughts about how we could at least detect
>> situations where we are invoking protocols that are not mixed-mode
>> safe (i.e., they pass 64-bit quantities by
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Did you have any thoughts about how we could at least detect
> situations where we are invoking protocols that are not mixed-mode
> safe (i.e., they pass 64-bit quantities by value, which our current
> thunking routine does not take
On 13 July 2018 at 11:57, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:21:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Patch #2 merges the remaining 32/64-bit specific parts of the setup_efi_pci
>> routine.
>>
>> Patches #3 and #4 do the same for the UGA draw protocol discovery routines.
>>
>> Patch
On 13 July 2018 at 15:29, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Lukas Wunner wrote:
>
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
>> @@ -413,6 +413,32 @@ static efi_status_t efi_file_close(void *handle)
>> return
* Lukas Wunner wrote:
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,32 @@ static efi_status_t efi_file_close(void *handle)
> return efi_call_proto(efi_file_handle, close, handle);
> }
>
> +static
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:21:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Patch #2 merges the remaining 32/64-bit specific parts of the setup_efi_pci
> routine.
>
> Patches #3 and #4 do the same for the UGA draw protocol discovery routines.
>
> Patch #6 helps unused code paths to be optimized away on
> >> Patch #6 helps unused code paths to be optimized away on
> >> configurations that don't need them (32-bit only and 64-bit only)
> >
> > I have tested this patch set on qemu and I see mixed mode kernel not
> > booting.
> > My test setup is:
> > Running qemu-system-x86_64 with 32 bit OVMF and
On 13 July 2018 at 03:59, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
>> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for mixed-mode UEFI on x86.
>>
>> Patch #1 adds the missing locking in the runtime service wrapper code for
>> mixed
>> mode. This was found by inspection rather than having been
Hi Ard,
> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for mixed-mode UEFI on x86.
>
> Patch #1 adds the missing locking in the runtime service wrapper code for
> mixed
> mode. This was found by inspection rather than having been reported but could
> be a candidate for -stable nonetheless.
>
>
On 12 July 2018 at 16:26, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-07-18 14:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for mixed-mode UEFI on x86.
>>
>> Patch #1 adds the missing locking in the runtime service wrapper code for
>> mixed mode. This was found by
Hi,
On 12-07-18 14:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
This series contains some fixes and cleanups for mixed-mode UEFI on x86.
Patch #1 adds the missing locking in the runtime service wrapper code for
mixed mode. This was found by inspection rather than having been reported
but could be a candidate for
This series contains some fixes and cleanups for mixed-mode UEFI on x86.
Patch #1 adds the missing locking in the runtime service wrapper code for
mixed mode. This was found by inspection rather than having been reported
but could be a candidate for -stable nonetheless.
Patch #2 merges the
12 matches
Mail list logo
