Re: [PATCH 13/14] Pramfs: Write Protection

2009-06-18 Thread Marco Stornelli
2009/6/18 Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 06:58:00PM +0200, Marco wrote: Jared Hulbert wrote: Why not just fix flush_tlb_range()? If an arch has a flush_tlb_kernel_page() that works then it stands to reason that the flush_tlb_kernel_range() shouldn't work with

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem

2009-06-18 Thread Marco Stornelli
2009/6/17 Chris Friesen cfrie...@nortel.com: Marco wrote: This is a second attempt at mainlining Pramfs. The first attempt was back in early 2004 by MontaVista. Since then the kernel code has almost been completely rewritten. So my first item on the list was porting the code on a recent

[PATCH 2/2] Modify MMCI/PL180 to handle agressive clocking v3

2009-06-18 Thread Linus Walleij
This adds a few clk_enable()/clk_disable() calls to the MMCI driver so as to handle an set_ios() request with clock frequency set to 0 as an instruction to gate the block clock. This also breaks out the clock setting code into its own function to simplify the set_ios() function a bit.

Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit

2009-06-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Paul Mundt wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: One topic that was partially touched on was dealing with various memories on embedded systems. We have several sram based allocators in the kernel for various different arch's: -

Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit

2009-06-18 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:59:20PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Paul Mundt wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: One topic that was partially touched on was dealing with various memories on embedded systems. We have several sram based