Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem

Ah now the write protection is a needed feature, in your previous comment you talked about why not use ext2/3... Marco Just for your information I tried the same test with pc in a virtual machine with 32MB of RAM: Version 1.03e       --Sequential Output--

Re: Status of bzip2 and lzma kernel compression for ARM?

Attached is a version of the ARM patch for 2.6.30 There seems to be some issues with the include files (which did not pose any problems in 2.6.28...), but hopefully somebody more experienced with the ARM architecture (and with its recent development) than I can help out there. Regards, Alain

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem

Pavel Machek wrote: Ah now the write protection is a needed feature, in your previous comment you talked about why not use ext2/3... Marco Just for your information I tried the same test with pc in a virtual machine with 32MB of RAM: Version 1.03e --Sequential Output--

Re: [PATCH 00/14] Pramfs: Persistent and protected ram filesystem

Pavel Machek wrote: Ah now the write protection is a needed feature, in your previous comment you talked about why not use ext2/3... Marco Just for your information I tried the same test with pc in a virtual machine with 32MB of RAM: Version 1.03e --Sequential Output--