On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:31:42PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:28:26AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
That's bad
Tim Bird wrote:
David Miller wrote:
From: Tim Bird tim.b...@am.sony.com
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:24:26 -0700
David Miller wrote:
I have card/switch combinations that take up to 10 seconds to
negotiate a proper link.
What types of delays are these timeouts supposed to
cover?
Hi,
a while ago I was working on a SoC with 200MHz ARM926EJ-S CPU
and integrated 100Mbit ethernet core, connected on internal
(fast) memory bus, with DMA. With iperf I measured:
TCP RX ~70Mbit/sec (iperf -s on SoC, iperf -c on destop PC)
TCP TX ~56Mbit/sec (iperf -s on destop PC, iperf -c
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
a while ago I was working on a SoC with 200MHz ARM926EJ-S CPU
and integrated 100Mbit ethernet core, connected on internal
(fast) memory bus, with DMA. With iperf I measured:
TCP RX ~70Mbit/sec (iperf -s on SoC, iperf -c on destop PC)
TCP TX ~56Mbit/sec
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 16:50 +0200, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi,
a while ago I was working on a SoC with 200MHz ARM926EJ-S CPU
and integrated 100Mbit ethernet core, connected on internal
(fast) memory bus, with DMA. With iperf I measured:
TCP RX ~70Mbit/sec (iperf -s on SoC, iperf -c
