On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
On 6 February 2011 16:14, Andrew Murray amur...@mpcdata.com wrote:
From: Andrew Murray amur...@mpc-data.co.uk
This patch updates the incomplete documentation concerning the printk
extended format specifiers.
Good one, thanks!
* Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
It is very rare to find a current system which is both sufficiently
resource constrained to want to compile out power management support
and sufficiently power insensitive to be able to tolerate doing so.
Since having the configuration
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:48:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Since having the configuration option requires non-zero effort to
maintain, with ifdefery in most drivers, but it is used with vanishing
rarity it is simpler to just remove
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
index 2657299..99e3c52 100644
--- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
@@ -1,23 +1,6 @@
config PM
- bool Power
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:13:24AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:22:15 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
+ bool
+ default y if
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:44:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Do you mean that these systems require CONFIG_PM be turned off, or just
that people tend not to turn it on? If the latter would you
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 15:50, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:44:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:18:29 + Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
Do you mean that these systems require CONFIG_PM be
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:19:16AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
At least some of the powerpc defconfigs were added with CONFIG_PM
disabled. I assume that was on purpose (though it may not have been).
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:36:31AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default to disabling it and if anything enabling it is the
option that requires special effort.
This may
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
It is very rare to find a current system which is both sufficiently
resource constrained to want to compile out power management support
and sufficiently power insensitive to be able to tolerate doing so.
Since having the configuration option
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:14:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
config PM_DEBUG
bool Power Management Debug Support
I think it would be better to simply rename CONFIG_PM_OPS into CONFIG_PM.
That still leaves the IA64 emulator to
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 18:12 +, Andrew Murray wrote:
On 7 February 2011 09:29, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:23:09PM +, Andrew Murray wrote:
+
+ For printing kernel pointers which should be hidden from unprivileged
+ users. The
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:46:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:14:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think it would be better to simply rename CONFIG_PM_OPS into CONFIG_PM.
That still leaves the IA64
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:00:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:15:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
Yeah, but some people seem very keen on removing
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:00:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:15:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
