On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 15:20 +0200, Marco wrote:
Are there any pending patents on this code?
NO, there aren't patents pending on this code. MontaVista had a pending
patent application but now it has abandoned this way. Daniel Walker can
confirm that.
Confirmed , there are no patents
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:05 +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
Thanks Tim and Daniel. Daniel the first thing to do to submit the
patches is check them to verify that they are compliant to the kernel
standard, if you'd like to help you are welcome.
Since the feature was already submitted once (or
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:25 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
Marco Stornelli wrote:
Hi Mike,
I am not the PRAMFS mantainer, and I think he is in charge to do that
(right?), I sent an email to Steve Longerbeam and to MontaVista support,
but I haven't received any response. However, if you think
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 01:18 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Hi Andrew,
You asked me to maintain it and resubmit when
merge frenzy is over.
Here is the update against current Linus tree
(which is 2.6.27-rc4-git3), rolled up into one patch.
Do you have the patches that actually use
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 22:45 -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote:
+#define AXFS_GET_BYTETABLE_VAL(desc,index) \
+ axfs_bytetable_stitch(((struct
axfs_region_desc)(desc)).table_byte_depth,\
+ (u8 *)((struct axfs_region_desc)(desc)).virt_addr, index)
+
+#define AXFS_GET_NODE_TYPE(sbi,node_index) \
+
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 19:20 -0700, David VomLehn wrote:
Allow diversion of characters generated through printk so that they can
be logged separately. The printk_time variables is made externally visible
so that functions processing the diverted characters can parse off the
time added if
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
Another note, usually when submitting new interfaces like this you
should also submit the code that uses the interface .. In your case you
might not be able to do
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you said usually people submit new interfaces, not it is usually
not accepted without at least one user.
Well, usually people do submit the users, and if they don't it's usually
not accepted..
I invite you to give some of the plenty
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 16:13 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
same sort of things as the point of David's code. early/crash
scenarios for people to safely extract portions of the kernel log
buffer for transmission/storage elsewhere. as was explained in the
original thread behind the commit.
How
