On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:20:42 +0100
Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote:
[Edited cc: list as my smtp server refused to send the original reply]
Apologies - I had copied down Grant Likely's email address wrong at ELCE.
Should I just submit the patch to this list?
You will get more feedback
Apologies again for getting Grant's email address wrong on my initial
email.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:40:08 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
There are already a large number of communication channels available
to Linux, with DBUS gatting the most attention at the moment. What
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Tony Ibbs t...@kynesim.co.uk wrote:
Apologies again for getting Grant's email address wrong on my initial
email.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:40:08 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
There are already a large number of communication channels
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 06:01:58PM +, Tony Ibbs wrote:
We talked briefly at ELCE 2010 in Cambridge, after the keeping
kernel maintainers happy talk, and you offered that I could
CC you when I got round to submitting our kernel module.
Hi Tony,
Yes, I remember talking to you. I'll take a
[Edited cc: list as my smtp server refused to send the original reply]
Our tentative patch is at
http://kbus.googlecode.com/files/0001-KBUS-messaging-subsystem.patch
The diffstat for the patch is:
Documentation/Kbus.txt | 1189 ++
include/linux/kbus_defns.h | 666 ++
