Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Phillip,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Phillip Lougher wrote:
This is a second attempt at mainlining Squashfs. The first attempt was way
This is great news!
I ran a quick test of squashfs 4.0 (the CVS version) on UML/ia32 and ppc64, and
it
seems to work fine!
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 00:42 +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
Yeah, Git is much better than CVS, however, I've got nowhere to host a
public Git repository. If someone were to offer hosting I'd be only too
happy to move over to Git.
Mail me a SSH public key (use a passphrase on it), and I'll
Phillip Lougher wrote:
Yeah, Git is much better than CVS, however, I've got nowhere to host a
public Git repository. If someone were to offer hosting I'd be only too
happy to move over to Git.
I can offer you hosting on mirror.celinuxforum.org. If you are
interested, let me know and I'll set
Hi Phillip,
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Phillip Lougher wrote:
This is a second attempt at mainlining Squashfs. The first attempt was way
This is great news!
I ran a quick test of squashfs 4.0 (the CVS version) on UML/ia32 and ppc64, and
it
seems to work fine! Great job! Let's hope we'll
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 02:12 +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
David P. Quigley wrote:
Looking through the code I see two references to xattrs, one is the
index of the xattr table in the superblock and there seems to be struct
member in one of the inode structures that is an index into this
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 00:42 +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
David P. Quigley wrote:
Looking through the code I noticed that you give certain object types
the same inode number for all instances of it (devices, fifo/sockets).
How is this done internally? Do these types of objects occupy
David P. Quigley wrote:
Looking through the code I see two references to xattrs, one is the
index of the xattr table in the superblock and there seems to be struct
member in one of the inode structures that is an index into this table.
Looking through the code I don't see either of these used at
David P. Quigley wrote:
In SELinux and
other LSMs symlinks and directories are also labeled so they will need
xattr entries.
BTW you don't mention device, fifo and socket inodes... Do they ever
get labelled? It's something I was going to look into closer to an
implementation, but it would
This is a second attempt at mainlining Squashfs. The first attempt was way
way back in early 2005 :-) Since then the filesystem layout has undergone
two major revisions, and the kernel code has almost been completely
rewritten. Both of these were to address the criticisms made at the original
On Fri, 17 October 2008 16:42:50 +0100, Phillip Lougher wrote:
Codewise all of the packed bit-fields and the swap macros have been removed in
favour of aligned structures and in-line swapping using leXX_to_cpu(). The
code has also been extensively restructured, reformatted to kernel coding
Looking through the code I see two references to xattrs, one is the
index of the xattr table in the superblock and there seems to be struct
member in one of the inode structures that is an index into this table.
Looking through the code I don't see either of these used at all. Do you
intend to add
11 matches
Mail list logo
