On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:16 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
These includes were added by 079effb6933f34b9b1b67b08bd4fd7fb672d16ef to
fix the build when using kmemtrace. However this is not necessary when
used to create a compressed kernel, and actually creates
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:17 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
When unaligned accesses are required for uncompressing a kernel (such as
for LZO decompression on ARM in a patch that follows), including
linux/kernel.h causes issues as it brings in a lot of things that
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:18 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
This is the first part of the lzo patch
Please pass this patch (and all others!) through scritps/checkpatch.pl.
checkpatch reports a number of trivial errors which you wouldn't have included
had you
On Friday 31 July 2009, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Restoring back the system state from MMC after a successful hibernation
http://marc.info/?t=12481853473r=1w=2
I don't agree with this approach. The point of the workqueue is so that
the kernel can do things in parallel, so this patch is a step
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:16 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
These includes were added by 079effb6933f34b9b1b67b08bd4fd7fb672d16ef to
fix the build when using kmemtrace. However this is not necessary when
used to create a compressed kernel,
On 08/04/2009 05:47 PM, Phillip Lougher wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:16 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
These includes were added by 079effb6933f34b9b1b67b08bd4fd7fb672d16ef to
fix the build when using kmemtrace. However this is not
On 08/04/2009 04:00 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
0.24 seconds booting speedup sounds pretty thin. Adding a new
decompression format will introduce more configuration/build/deployment
complexities. How do we justify this?
Keep in mind this may be out of a 3-5 second boot budget.
-hpa
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/04/2009 05:47 PM, Phillip Lougher wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:58:16 +0200
Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com wrote:
These includes were added by 079effb6933f34b9b1b67b08bd4fd7fb672d16ef to
fix the build when using kmemtrace.
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:47:57 +0100 Phillip Lougher
phil...@lougher.demon.co.uk wrote:
What do you normally do in this situation?
I normally fix the rejects ;)
But I'd like to confirm that the two patches don't fix the same thing
via different means. Lacking a full
