On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Maybe the best solution is
> > to write separate driver for OF which will be just wrapper for platform
> > driver... Just like you suggested.
I'd certainly prefer that: packaging all the OF glue in
a small bit of OF glue code, which does
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Marc Pignat wrote:
> This is why I proposed to split the driver in two parts (gpio only mdio
> driver + OF platform device). Just treating OF GPIO as any other GPIO.
I think that's overall a much cleaner approach too. Keeps
OF's hardware abstraction layer out of dri
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Paulius Zaleckas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 03:11, David Brownell wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
> available on all pla
Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 03:11, David Brownell wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
> available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
> to enable t
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 03:11, David Brownell wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
to enable this approach to #ifdef eliminat
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
...
> i understand the compiler side just fine. my point is that the
> current linux/of_gpio.h only defines the OF structure and related
> prototypes when CONFIG_OF_GPIO is defined. so it needs updating
> first.
This is why I proposed to spli
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 03:11, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
>> > available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
>> > to enable this approach to #ifdef elimination.
>>
>> OF is open fir
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If indeed OF functions don't have declarations which are
> > available on all platforms, that might be worth fixing
> > to enable this approach to #ifdef elimination.
>
> OF is open firmware right ? no way there's going to be OF for every
> p
