Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-08-13 Thread Adrian Hunter
Matt Fleming wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: Pierre Ossman wrote: Con: - The scanning code gets less clear as you increase the number of possible paths through it. - Different systems will have different init sequences, possibly provoking bugs in

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-08-13 Thread Matt Fleming
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:27:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: davem has set up linux-...@vger.kernel.org for us. It will be archived at marc.info. Thanks to both.. I was thinking that we wouldn't need a separate list but then I realised I didn't have anywhere to send MMC bug reports.

Re: [PATCH 4/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels for ARM

2009-08-13 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote : On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: This is the second part of patch. This part includes: - changes to ach/arch/boot/Makefile to make it easier to add new compression types - new

Re: [PATCH 4/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels for ARM

2009-08-13 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 08/13/2009 02:30 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:31:25AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote : On 08/11/2009 09:27 AM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: So I guess the only options left are either define a dummy raise() function, or get rid of the divisions like Alain Knaff did in his

Re: New MMC maintainer needed

2009-08-13 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Adrian Hunter wrote: Results in microseconds: before after eMMC 194145 193641 uSD 41432129 However, that excludes powering up. For example the pbias setting on omap_hsmmc for MMC1 (uSD for us) has a 100ms delay. So the