On 07/01/2011 22:59, Tony Luck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Marco Stornelli
marco.storne...@gmail.com wrote:
constraint). About the errors: pramfs does not maintain file data in the
page caches for normal file I/O, so no writeback, the read/write
operation are done with
2011/1/10 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz:
On 07/01/2011 22:59, Tony Luck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Marco Stornelli
marco.storne...@gmail.com wrote:
constraint). About the errors: pramfs does not maintain file data in the
page caches for normal file I/O, so no writeback, the
On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific
CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use.
However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed and c) not cc'ed
to the networking list. So its prospects
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:35:33 -0600 Rob Landley wrote:
On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific
CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use.
However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:35:33 -0600 Rob Landley wrote:
On 01/06/2011 05:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Probably a worthwhile thing to do, IMO. If there's some net-specific
CONFIG_DEBUG_ setting then that wold be a better thing to use.
However the patch was a) wordwrapped, b) space-stuffed
You'd be better running ext2 over special block device,
it is quite simple.
Marco,
You might want to spend some more time answering this question
(it is a particularly good one). What are the reasons to use
pramfs, rather than a ext2 over a mem-block driver. You covered
some in your part 0
Il 10/01/2011 18:35, Luck, Tony ha scritto:
You'd be better running ext2 over special block device,
it is quite simple.
Marco,
You might want to spend some more time answering this question
(it is a particularly good one). What are the reasons to use
pramfs, rather than a ext2 over a
