On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:38:38PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Andrew, Linus:
The git repository described in the following pull request implements
a generic PWM device driver API. This API is intended to eventually
supercede the existing PWM device drivers, but during a migration
period
On 02/28/11 10:31, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:38:38PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Andrew, Linus:
The git repository described in the following pull request implements
a generic PWM device driver API. This API is intended to eventually
supercede the existing PWM device
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:43:20AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Greg et. al:
Definitely too late to pull for this review cycle. I guess I should have
made that clearer.
I figured there would be more discussion on it, so I posted now in hopes
that the discussion could conclude before the
On 28 Feb 2011, at 07:52, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
Just go ahead and post to lkml. There isn't a whole lot of point in
holding back from there, and that is the only way you'll get the level
of review that you need
On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
You are using /proc/* to something that is not process related.
At lkml you will be requested to use something else.
OK. That's mainly through ignorance of what I *should* be using
instead (and perhaps poor reading of Linux Device Drivers). Do you
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:25:41PM +, Tony Ibbs wrote:
On 28 Feb 2011, at 19:23, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
You are using /proc/* to something that is not process related.
At lkml you will be requested to use something else.
OK. That's mainly through ignorance of what I *should* be using
