On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:28:23 +0300, Ran Shalit said:
Does anybody know what is the minimum expected time for sleep period
with the cpuidle ?
Both processor dependent and sleep level dependent. There's a certain
amount of latency induced by the hardware waking up.
Look at
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:36:04 CST, Rob Landley said:
On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:28:22 Ingo Oeser wrote:
+for i in MSEC 1000 USEC 100
+do
+ NAME=$(echo $i | awk '{print $1}')
cut -d' ' -f1 does the same
+ PERIOD=$(echo $i | awk '{print $2}')
cut -d' ' -f2 does the
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:33:48 +0200, Denys Vlasenko said:
The purpose of these patches is to make kernel buildable
with gcc -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections.
Newer gcc and binutils can do dead code and data removal
at link time. It is achieved using combination of
-ffunction-sections
