On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> Adding Arjan to CC. Arjan, if you are OK with the patch, I can take
> it through my tree with your Ack.
I don't mind the patch, although I feel pitty for those having to work
with such broken systems...
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 1/15/2011 11:33 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Do you talk about
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=22a9d645677feefd402befd02edd59b122289ef1
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4ace92fc112c6069b4fcb95a31d3142d4a43f
On 1/15/2011 12:40 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
There are some reports [1] [2] looking at the boot time of embedded
(ARM?) systems using initcall debug [3]. Both reports seem to show
that they have issues with the start up sequence of the kernel being
completely single-threaded. In [2] Greg mentions
r the bus there's no "and now we've seen
all" operation.
--
Arjan van de VenIntel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
Paul Mackerras wrote:
Linus Torvalds writes:
4kB used to be the _only_ choice. And no, there weren't even irq stacks.
So that 4kB was not just the whole kernel call-chain, it was also all the
irq nesting above it.
I think your memory is failing you. In 2.4 and earlier, the kernel
stack was
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:07:04 +0100
David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:41 -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> > +# Added and removed items are shown with a leading plus or minus,
> > +# respectively. Changed items show the old and new values on a
> > +# single line.
>
> It
