plumbers device tree track -- last call

2015-06-19 Thread Frank Rowand
, UTC-7:00), with a very brief comment on why your attendance will be useful. Regards, Frank Rowand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-embedded in

Re: Device Tree at Plumbers, early registration ends Friday

2015-06-01 Thread Frank Rowand
On 5/30/2015 2:36 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: The Linux Plumbers Device Tree track was accepted by the Plumbers conference. The above is a pasto, ycch. The track is, of course: Device Tree Tools, Validation, and Troubleshooting The DEADLINE for EARLY BIRD REGISTRATION at a reduced price

Device Tree at Plumbers, looking for topics and session leaders

2015-05-30 Thread Frank Rowand
/ Plumbers will be co-located with LinuxCon North America in Seattle (Plumbers is Aug 19-21, Linuxcon is Aug 17-19). Hope to see many of you in Seattle. Regards, Frank Rowand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-embedded in the body of a message to majord

Device Tree at Plumbers, early registration ends Friday

2015-05-30 Thread Frank Rowand
soon now. Preliminary results are that I will be presenting a talk on DT debugging in that track. LinuxCon North America info is at: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-north-america Hope to see many of you in Seattle. Regards, Frank Rowand -- To unsubscribe from this list

Re: Why is the deferred initcall patch not mainline?

2014-10-22 Thread Frank Rowand
On 10/21/2014 12:37 PM, Bird, Tim wrote: snip With regards to doing it dynamically, I'd have to think about how to do that. Having text-based lists of things to do at runtime seems to fit with how we're using device tree these days, but I'm not sure how that would work. Initcall function

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time

2011-02-09 Thread Frank Rowand
On 02/09/11 09:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, February 09, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:35:29PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: For 2.6.38-rc4, x86_64, CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4: size vmlinux text data bss dec hex filename 6553910 3555020

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time

2011-02-09 Thread Frank Rowand
On 02/09/11 10:40, Mark Brown wrote: On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:31:29AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: Raphael's patch will turn on CONFIG_PM in the correct circumstances, and leave it off when not needed by other config options. That means that the size overhead will _not_ be an issue for me

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time

2011-02-08 Thread Frank Rowand
On 02/08/11 04:21, Ingo Molnar wrote: snip Also, i've Cc:-ed Linus, to check whether the idea to make power management a permanent, core portion of Linux has any obvious downsides we missed. Rafael, could you do a defconfig-ish x86 build with and without CONFIG_PM, and post the 'size